个人所得税

ysun wrote:

怕只怕该公司到时侯自己随便编一个“缴税凭证”糊弄你。这年头，某一部分人为了先富起来，什么事情都干得出！

[Edited at 2011-03-16 06:49 GMT]

Yang Min wrote:

到目前为止，还拿不出证据证明人家有啥猫腻。如果有的话，岂不吃哑巴亏了？我一个朋友是做会计的，听说开个缴税证明只是分分钟的事。

ysun wrote:


按理说，那家公司应同时向税务局提供此缴税证明。你在报税时可将此缴税证明的复印件报给税务局。这笔收入，你就不用再缴税了。如果那家公司侵吞了代扣的税款，那就让税务局去查他吧。

wherestip wrote:

依我看，似乎还是个人收入税务体制不健全。 付钱方愿扣就代扣一下，不愿扣就算了。事后，国家税务局方面、付钱方面、挣钱方面 均无对扣留的款项作任何交代或结算。

况且从以上的的点点滴滴发言来看，似乎个人向国家报缴所得税也完全是靠自觉的。 年终不报税、不缴税的又奈他何呢？

Sounds like the wild wild west to me. Might as well call this some kind of transaction tax or value added tax instead of an income tax.

ysun wrote:

即使翻译公司以代扣名义把扣下的税款塞进私囊，估计税务局也无从得知。
从另一方面讲，税务局也无从得知一名自由译者一年的总收入有多少，无从得知他到底被人代扣了多少税。

[Edited at 2011-03-28 23:17 GMT]

Yang Min wrote:

话说回来，就目前内地的那种翻译价格，经翻译公司层层盘剥后，再缴20％甚至更高的税，那翻译恐怕也做不下去了。

wherestip wrote:



依我看，似乎还是个人收入税务体制不健全。 付钱方愿扣就代扣一下，不愿扣就算了。事后，国家税务局方面、付钱方面、挣钱方面 均无对扣留的款项作任何交代或结算。

况且从以上众人的点点滴滴发言来看，似乎个人向国家报缴所得税也完全是靠自觉的。 年终不报税、不缴税的，税务局又奈他如何呢？

Sounds like the wild wild west to me. Might as well call this some kind of transaction tax or value added tax instead of an income tax.


[Edited at 2011-03-29 13:27 GMT]

Yang Min wrote:

这里面涉及到方方面面的厉害关系和个人利益。从前段时间“我的爸爸是李刚”到现在的李刚陷害门事件，可以看出所谓的法律规章制度，在执行效率上是要打很大折扣的。执法人尚且如此，更不用说其他人了。

Jade Liu wrote:

名为“代扣”，实为“克扣”。

ysun wrote:



应该狠狠地扣一扣“和珅”及其“先富起来”的儿孙们（if any）。“和珅跌倒，嘉庆吃饱”！

《世界各国税负大比拼 中国人一年为税工作161天》
http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2011-04/18/c_121318891.htm

Yang Min wrote:

发配到西藏去开荒种青稞，然后八辈儿孙不得当公务员，全部到农村种庄稼打工！

...

卢森堡：负率为37%，纳税人为税工作135天

冰岛：税负率为32%，纳税人为税工作117天

美国：税负率为27%，纳税人为税工作99天

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/Advice/YourRealTaxRate40.aspx

Your real tax rate: 40%

Income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, Social Security and Medicare taxes, 'sin' taxes and the rest add up to a virtual flat tax nationwide.

...

Politicians talk this way because they generally talk about only one tax: the federal income tax, which offers graduated rates from 10% to 35%.

Politicians rarely talk about what real people experience: the true maze of taxes and government benefits. If someone put them all together, we could see what our actual tax burden was. We could see who pays at the highest or lowest rates. Discussions of tax policy wouldn't be a waste of time.

Well, two researchers did it.

In a study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston University economists Laurence J. Kotlikoff and David Rapson have found that our all-in marginal tax rate is 40%, give or take a bit.

Yes, you read that right: 40%.

Most workers will pay about that much on each dollar of income when all taxes -- federal and state income taxes, sales taxes, taxes for benefit programs, etc. -- are considered.

As a consequence, a 30-year-old couple earning only $20,000 a year has a marginal tax rate of 42.5%, while a 45-year-old couple earning $500,000 pays at 43.2%. There are some exceptions: A 30-year-old couple earning $50,000 a year, for instance, pays 24.4%, and a 60-year-old couple making $150,000 a year faces a tax rate of 47.7%.

wherestip wrote:

...

又比方说, Video Games 一般刚出来要卖 $60. 过一两年后只不过 $20 左右. 但美国的生活水平不能光从这种娱乐消费品衡量. 最主要的开支还是 衣食住行和教育、医疗之类. 对 middle income families 来讲, 各种各样的 taxes 加起来要占每年收入的很大比例, 并不见得比西欧低.

Tax Freedom Day is the first day of the year in which a nation as a whole has theoretically earned enough income to fund its annual tax burden. It is annually calculated in the United States by the Tax Foundation—a Washington, D.C.-based tax research organization. Every dollar that is officially considered income by the government is counted, and every payment to the government that is officially considered a tax is counted. Taxes at all levels of government—local, state and federal—are included.

...

The Tax Foundation defends its methodology by pointing out that Tax Freedom Day is the U.S. economy's overall average tax burden—not the tax burden of the "average" American, which is how it is often misinterpreted by members of the media.[26] Tax Foundation materials do not use the phrase "tax burden of the average American", although members of the media often make this mistake.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric

Recent Controversies

...

In March 2011, The New York Times reported that despite earning $14.2 billion in worldwide profits, including more than $5 billion from U.S. operations, General Electric did not owe taxes in 2010. General Electric had a tax benefit of $3.2 billion. This same article also pointed out that despite their continually diminishing tax liability since the 1990's, GE has laid off one-fifth of their American workers since 2002. [39]