| Pages in topic: < [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15] |
| User | Thread poster: N.M. Eklund Can the KudoZ term search function be improved? (staff: 'OK, improvements made') |
|---|
aivars 
Argentina
Local time: 03:27
 Member (2003)
English to Spanish
+ ...
| | Only 1st page of results show | Aug 21, 2009 |
Colin,
When I click on page 2 and so on, of results, I'm getting a sth is wrong! msg. thx
a
[My pair is EN > ES. I can see only the 1st page of results. Tested on Chrome, IE]
[Edited at 2009-08-21 17:29 GMT]
| | | |
Sisiutl
Mexico
Local time: 00:27
 Partial member (2005)
French to English
+ ...
| | Follow-up on Problem with apostrophes | Aug 26, 2009 |
Problem seems to have been fixed.
Thank you very much.
| | | |
Sisiutl
Mexico
Local time: 00:27
Partial member (2005)
French to English
+ ...
| | Apostrophes, yet again | Aug 27, 2009 |
My mistake: it isn't fixed yet.
Please see whether something can be done to remedy this problem.
Thank you.
| | | |
David Russi
United States
Local time: 23:27
English to Spanish
+ ...
| | Why are personal glossary entries in triplicate? | Aug 29, 2009 |
The plethora of repetitions makes it difficult to weed through the search results. Is there no way for the search to parse for identical strings and not display them?
Here is a clear example, search EN>SP for "job interview".
[Edited at 2009-08-29 04:26 GMT]
| | | |
B D Finch
France
Local time: 07:27
 Member (2006)
French to English
+ ...
| | Text doesn't fit term field | Sep 7, 2009 |
Suddenly the bottom half of the text I enter in the term search field is cut off. This and other users' comments most of which I endorse lead one to ask why fix it if it ain't broke?
| | | |
aivars
Argentina
Local time: 03:27
Member (2003)
English to Spanish
+ ...
| | Only 1st page of results show | Sep 18, 2009 |
this was solved, but again, so editing past request
Only 1st page of results show Sep 18
Colin,
When I click on page 2 and so on, of results, I'm getting a sth is wrong! msg. thx
a
[My pair is EN > ES. I can see only the 1st page of results. Tested on Chrome, IE]
[Edited at 2009-08-21 17:29 GMT]
| | | |
David Russi
United States
Local time: 23:27
English to Spanish
+ ...
| | Is anyone there...? | Sep 18, 2009 |
Seems like no posts to this thread have ben answered at all in a long time.
| | | |
Colin Brady
Australia
Local time: 01:27
French to English
+ ...
| | Cannot reproduce the problem | Sep 18, 2009 |
aivars wrote:
this was solved, but again, so editing past request
Only 1st page of results show Sep 18
Colin,
When I click on page 2 and so on, of results, I'm getting a sth is wrong! msg. thx
a
[My pair is EN > ES. I can see only the 1st page of results. Tested on Chrome, IE]
[Edited at 2009-08-21 17:29 GMT] |
|
Hi aivars,
Can you please specify the term you searched for and any other settings that may help me reproduce the problem? I tried logging in as you and running a search and it worked fine.
| | | |
bmtraducciones
Chile
English to Spanish
+ ...
| | I couldn't agree more | Sep 23, 2009 |
I wonder what the use of "advanced options" is. You specify the field of interest but still the system will show you all the other fields found.
Is it possible to go back to how it was before or at least improve the former system instead of creating something that doesn't work well.
David Moore wrote:
Please go back to how it was - it may even have irritated me at times, but this is NO improvement. AT ALL... |
|
| | | |
moken
Spain
Local time: 06:27
English to Spanish
+ ...
| | Advanced options: Prioritise? | Oct 11, 2011 |
Hi Colin & co. - is this thread still working or is there another KOG feedback thread going?
If it is, hopefully you'll find the following suggestion useful:
How about using the advanced search features to prioritise the results in the chosen fields rather than exclude those that are not actually filed under them?
Bearing in mind that Kudoz are filed according to the criteria of whoever makes the entry and that they are not systematically reviewed, users can often make entries in fields different to those where a searcher might expect to find them using his/her own logic.
By making the advanced search list a 'priorities' list, results would still show up even when they're not entered in the fields the searcher would expect them to be in. This would be especially useful in those cases in which there are few or no results in the expected fields and the result is hidden away elsewhere in the archives.
In practice we'd be speaking of a way to sort results not only according to exact matches but also to the preferred fields.
Thanks for your kind attention,
Alf.
|  |  |
| | | |
| Pages in topic: < [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15] |
The translation workplace 
