Off topic: Legal precedents involving translators and interpreters
Thread poster: yolanda Speece
I know I have done similar forums to this one but I found a very good case regarding Title VI of the Civil Rights act.
Lau V. Nichols
The United States Supreme
Court held that the San Francisco
School District violated Title VI by failing to take affirmative steps to assist LEP Chinese students.
Lau and subsequent cases interpret Title VI as obligating recipients of federal funds to provide language services. However, in the past, the federal
government had not done enough to assist recipients of federal funds in understanding the scope of Title
VI or in assisting recipients in complying with Title VI.
Anybody know of any other cases such as this one? Please share!
To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:
You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »
Legal precedents involving translators and interpreters
|Anycount & Translation Office 3000|
|Translation Office 3000|
Translation Office 3000 is an advanced accounting tool for freelance translators and small agencies. TO3000 easily and seamlessly integrates with the business life of professional freelance translators.
More info »
|The words you want Anywhere, Anytime|
WordFinder is the market's fastest and easiest way of finding the right word, term, translation or synonym in one or more dictionaries. In our assortment you can choose among more than 120 dictionaries in 15 languages from leading publishers.
More info »