Restricting to wrong native language Thread poster: Arnaud HERVE
|
|---|
Arnaud HERVE 
France
Local time: 05:36
English to French
+ ...
I have several times observed recently that job posters make the mistake of restricting their jobs to native speakers only, but native speakers of the source language.
Obviously they mean native speakers of the target language. They check the wrong box.
I would like only the target button to be presented by default, and then an expendable for other languages, in the 0.01% cases it can happen.
| | | | Elisabete Cunha
Portugal
Local time: 04:36
Member (2006)
English to Portuguese
+ ...
| Totally agree | Jun 18, 2009 |
It happens a lot. And it doesn't make any sense at all. I sometimes can not quote on projects within my language pairs and areas of expertise just because the job is restricted to native speakers of the source language... And we can clearly see that the job poster made a mistake without even noticing it.
Arnaud HERVE wrote:
I have several times observed recently that job posters make the mistake of restricting their jobs to native speakers only, but native speakers of the source language.
Obviously they mean native speakers of the target language. They check the wrong box.
I would like only the target button to be presented by default, and then an expendable for other languages, in the 0.01% cases it can happen.
| | | | Steven Capsuto
United States
Local time: 23:36
Member (2004)
Spanish to English
+ ...
| It might not be a mistake | Jun 18, 2009 |
Some clients really do want a native speaker of the source language, especially for culturally-bound texts or other material where there are nuances likely to be lost on anyone outside the culture and language.
The next step varies from client to client. Some then hire a native speaker of the target language to fix the style. Others don't, especially if it's for in-house use and substance is more important than style.
[Edited at 2009-06-18 19:36 GMT]
| | | | Laurent KRAULAND (X)
France
Local time: 05:36
French to German
+ ...
| Is there an opportunity to review? | Jun 18, 2009 |
My question so far, is the job poster asked to check all his entries twice (for example)?
Laurent K.
| | |
|
|
|
Tina Vonhof (X)
Canada
Local time: 21:36
Dutch to English
+ ...
| Easy to prevent | Jun 18, 2009 |
This problem could easily be prevented if outsourcers actually had to fill in what native language they are looking for.
| | | | Arnaud HERVE
France
Local time: 05:36
English to French
+ ...
TOPIC STARTER
I want a box with the TARGET language by default, and for the - exceptional - occasions that Steven mentions, it should be enough to add a "change" button.
By the way I prefer that box to be already checked by default, because it is obvious pro standards (!). If the outsourcer wants to specify "No, it's ok if my translator is not a native", that's some kind of responsibility that this site could maybe not encourage. Tolerate but not encourage.
In the present situation, ... See more I want a box with the TARGET language by default, and for the - exceptional - occasions that Steven mentions, it should be enough to add a "change" button.
By the way I prefer that box to be already checked by default, because it is obvious pro standards (!). If the outsourcer wants to specify "No, it's ok if my translator is not a native", that's some kind of responsibility that this site could maybe not encourage. Tolerate but not encourage.
In the present situation, the "right" translators are compelled to open a support ticket, which unduly loads the staff's work.
During the handling of the support ticket, the non natives are given an opportunity to quote first, which is not a good method either for a site like this.
UNLESS the outsourcer really wants to select the translator in the way contrary to everybody else, of course. I never do that, personally.
[Edited at 2009-06-18 20:29 GMT] ▲ Collapse
| | | | Uldis Liepkalns
Latvia
Local time: 06:36
Member (2003)
English to Latvian
+ ...
| Never assume anything (without possessing full information) | Jun 18, 2009 |
Sometimes when, say, translating (Lithuanian, Latvian, Finnish or whatever) legal documents into English, it is important the translator is acquainted with source country Laws and practises, not the completely different English Legal system... This is just one example, but I could write a page of such examples when it is more important for the translator to understand the source in nuances, while a perfect command of the target language is not so important.
So - maybe sometimes outs... See more Sometimes when, say, translating (Lithuanian, Latvian, Finnish or whatever) legal documents into English, it is important the translator is acquainted with source country Laws and practises, not the completely different English Legal system... This is just one example, but I could write a page of such examples when it is more important for the translator to understand the source in nuances, while a perfect command of the target language is not so important.
So - maybe sometimes outsourcers are just negligent, but NOT ALWAYS.
Uldis ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Definitely don't assume it's a mistake | Jun 19, 2009 |
There was an Nl-En job the other day that was restricted to Dutch natives. It was definitely not a mistake. The Dutch owner of the agency firmly believes that Dutch natives are the best translators to use for Nl-En translations and she is far from being a unique case. (She feels that native Anglos are good enough for proofreading, as long as they don't change the actual translation. Or at least that's what she tells them when they apply to the agency).
I've seen such jobs in other languag... See more There was an Nl-En job the other day that was restricted to Dutch natives. It was definitely not a mistake. The Dutch owner of the agency firmly believes that Dutch natives are the best translators to use for Nl-En translations and she is far from being a unique case. (She feels that native Anglos are good enough for proofreading, as long as they don't change the actual translation. Or at least that's what she tells them when they apply to the agency).
I've seen such jobs in other language pairs too. The reasoning often used to justify this is the notion that target language natives can't possibly have enough knowledge of the source language to pick up on all the nuances, which I personally find a rather insulting insinuation.
In any case, I never automatically assume there's mistake in a job offer restricted to source language natives only.
[Edited at 2009-06-19 10:03 GMT] ▲ Collapse
| | |
|
|
|
| | Arnaud HERVE
France
Local time: 05:36
English to French
+ ...
TOPIC STARTER | Thank you Ian an | Jun 21, 2009 |
It still seems to me common sense to allow by default translators who are target natives to bid, and also to relieve the burden of the staff receiving support tickets.
I don't know... perhaps I don't have natural common sense...
| | | | Arnaud HERVE
France
Local time: 05:36
English to French
+ ...
TOPIC STARTER
Today I saw an IT>FR job restricted to SP native speakers.
It cannot be a manager's choice, imho. Default must be set on target language.
| | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Restricting to wrong native language | Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
| | CafeTran Espresso | You've never met a CAT tool this clever!
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
