Clarification on site rule 4 (Offensive language is not permitted)
Marie-Hélène Hayles Italy Local time: 05:17 Member (2004) Italian to English + ...
Sep 17, 2009
I've recently found out that a longstanding and well-respected member of Proz has been placed on moderation for repeatedly using offensive language in their posts to the forums. They were informed of three specific words they had used which were considered offensive. I won't repeat them here for fear that this post would also be removed, but in my opinion - that is, from the point of view of a 40-year-old, native English speaking, British woman - there is nothing particularly offensive about any of them. In fact, I searched for their previous use in the forums, and the results were interesting: Word A (which I consider to be nothing more than mild slang) produced 421 hits in the forums; Word B (a relatively mild insult, no longer used in its literal sense) produced 57 hits and Word C (arguably the strongest term) has been used without comment in these forums on 86 different occasions.
It's actually not my intention to argue or invite public discussion on which words should or should not be considered as acceptable. However, I do think this issue should be discussed among staff and moderators in order that consistent moderation is applied. Naturally, it would be helpful if a list of words whose use is permitted were added to the appropriate rule.
[Edited at 2009-09-17 15:43 GMT]
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Michele Johnson Germany Local time: 05:17 German to English + ...
Almost enough to make one think it's personal, isn't it?
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Rebekka Groß United Kingdom Local time: 04:17 Member (2001) English to German
Could it be due to the new moderators?
Sep 17, 2009
I don't know who or which words are referred to here so am totally impartial but I'm wondering whether this was action by a new moderator and whether newly appointed moderators may interpret the rules more strictly and more literally than more seasoned moderators?
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Clarification on site rules and rules enforcement should be requested through the support system
Sep 17, 2009
Hello all,
Just a few points to make which might help clarify. Moderators and site staff use their best judgment when deciding to enforce http://www.proz.com/siterules/general/4#4 . Site rule http://www.proz.com/siterules/general/2#2 also talks about courtesy and professionalism, so a good rule of thumb may be to ask oneself when posting, "would I use X in addressing a colleague in a courteous, professional discussion?"
If you are aware of a rules violation, be it in the forums, KudoZ, or anywhere else on the site, the best course of action is to report it either to the moderator(s) for the given area, or to staff, through the support system.
Finally, clarification regarding site rules or rules enforcement actions should also be directed through the support system (see http://www.proz.com/siterules/forum/14#14 ). I'm locking this thread for this reason, but please feel free to use the support channel for further or more specific questions on this. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jared
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: