presupuesto jurídico que queda efectivamente actualizado en el caso que se revis

13:52 Mar 18, 2010 

Thank you!

19:54 Mar 14, 2010 

you've got my two cents also....go for it!!!!!bye

18:48 Mar 14, 2010 

I think you've got it Brandon. Sounds very good to me.

16:03 Mar 14, 2010 

Your answers have been very helpful. Thank you! I´m posting my train of thought here for the benefit (hopefully it's helpful, ha!) of those searching kudoz for terminology, etc. (and for my benefit, of course) and I'd love any feedback on this latest version: <br />
"A legal presumption that still effectively stands in the case under review, given that in this case a legal entity exists that is using, exploiting or utilizing national waters under a concession, and is therefore obligated to pay the water duty in the manner and under the terms expressly and previously set forth in the cited legislation and as follows: [sic]" (still a run-on sentence)

A "presumption" (normally "presunción") can be formed by "supuestos"... "assumptions" as Smartranslators pointed out. A "presumption" is "an inference of the truth or falsity of a proposition or fact that stands until rebutted by evidence to the contrary."

In this case, the burden of proof to disprove the "supuestos" against it in the agency's "presumption" falls on the taxpayer, who thus far has not produced any evidence. Thus the "presumption still stands".

Any thoughts? Thanks!

16:22 Mar 13, 2010 

[This is] a legal condition that remains effectively current in the case under review, considering that in this case a legal entity exists that is using, exploiting or utilizing national waters under a concession, and therefore it is obligated to pay the water duty in the manner and under the terms expressly and previously set forth in the cited legislation and as follows:

15:42 Mar 13, 2010 

They don't seem to have the legal meaning I'm looking for (show if I'm wrong.) I feel like my investigation is getting me good approximations, but I'm not yet hitting the bulls-eye. Here's what I have so far: legal requirement, prerequisite; presumption of law; legal obligation; legal condition. I'm leaning toward condition, considering the preceding Article 222 states that individuals or legal entities that use, exploit or utilize national waters, whether de facto or under a title of concession, are obligated to pay duties. The paragraph in question seems to be pointing to the fact that the "condition" of Article 222 is met in that the party is a legal entity using national waters under a concession. Any thoughts? Thanks!

11:32 Mar 13, 2010 

Diría que "presupuesto jurídico" = legal assumption. Saludos