в степени (1 - 2/5) = 0,6

English translation: degree of inclusion

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
Russian term or phrase:в степени
English translation:degree of inclusion
Entered by: Susan Welsh

12:10 Jun 30, 2015
Russian to English translations [PRO]
Science - Mathematics & Statistics / math in an article on psychology/linguistics
Russian term or phrase: в степени (1 - 2/5) = 0,6
These "units" and the five "attributes" have to do with Vygtoskyian psychology of the relationship between word and meaning.

Такое свойство единицы, как «быть частью» какой-либо системы, т.е. «быть включенной» в ее функционирование или развитие, является необходимым, но не достаточным признаком единицы. Если у части системы отсутствуют другие признаки единицы, например, два из пяти признаков, то такая часть является единицей системы ***в степени (1 - 2/5) = 0,6, а в степени 0,4 она единицей не является.*** Продолжая обсуждение первого признака единицы, приведем одно из основных определений, которое Л.С. Выготский дал этому понятию: «Под единицей мы подразумеваем такой продукт анализа, который в отличие от элементов обладает всеми основными свойствами, присущими целому, и который является далее неразложимыми живыми частями этого единства.»

I know that в степени usually means "to the power of," but can't make sense out of that sentence.

My draft:
If a part of the system lacks other attributes of a unit, for example, two out of the five attributes, this part is a unit of the system to the power of (1−2/5) = 0.6, but 0.4 power is not a unit.

(which makes no sense)
Susan Welsh
United States
Local time: 00:21
see expalanation below
Explanation:
This isn't really mathematical, it's a qualitative argument that I suggest phrasing as something like "this unit's degree of inclusion is (1 - 2/5) = 0.6"

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2015-06-30 18:30:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Possibly (lexemic) class membership is what is being referred to?

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2015-06-30 18:33:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I have no idea to what extent Vygotsky used "fuzzy membership" but that is [possibly related.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2015-06-30 18:46:35 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Fuzzy sets and logic are quite reputable :-) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Нечёткое_множество

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 hrs (2015-07-01 11:30:32 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Well done! My first reaction (a long time ago) was much the same as yours. It's currently used for quite interesting things in linguistics e.g. Marine De Cock discusses the modifier "more or less" in this context.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day4 hrs (2015-07-01 16:41:24 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------

I've worked all my life in Maths & Stats. Once one can identify the concept, it tends to be relatively straightforward to carry it across. One doesn't have niggly issues like Ambiguity, Register, Grammar etc to worry about :-)
Selected response from:

DLyons
Ireland
Local time: 05:21
Grading comment
Thanks! (For a guy who works in Spanish and French, which I don't, you certainly seem to turn up in every language pair that I do work in!)
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
5one minus two fifths equals six tenths. i.e. these are NOT exponents/powers
Mikhail Kropotov
3 +1see expalanation below
DLyons
3to the degree / to the extent
Amy Lesiewicz
5 -2See explanation
Alexander Teplitsky


Discussion entries: 5





  

Answers


3 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
to the degree / to the extent


Explanation:
I don't think it represents a mathematical operator here, but just as a measure of "belonging" in this case.

Amy Lesiewicz
United States
Local time: 00:21
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 4
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

3 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5
one minus two fifths equals six tenths. i.e. these are NOT exponents/powers


Explanation:
в степени here means to a certain degree / extent

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2015-06-30 12:21:08 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

grammar parsing at the end of the sentence:

... this part is a unit of the system to 60% degree (1 -- 2/5 = 3/5), and not a unit to 40%.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 mins (2015-06-30 12:24:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

perhaps the term "belonging index" may be used:

it's belonging index is 0.6 (1 -- 2/5 = 3/5)

Mikhail Kropotov
Germany
Local time: 06:21
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Russian
PRO pts in category: 124
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

30 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5 peer agreement (net): -2
See explanation


Explanation:
Let's look at the meaning first: in this example, единица системы имеет 5 характеристик. Если, например, две из них отсутствуют, то мы говорим, что это часть единицы в степени (1 - 2/5). [Любая другая часть единицы не будет равна 1^(2/5)], поэтому 1^0,4 не равна 1^0,6. Теперь, выскажем ту же мысль по английски: If the 1 unit of the system has 5 characteristics, than to the part of the unit, that has only 3 of them we assign the value of (1 - 2/5) = 0.6. No other part of the unit (e.g. 1^0.4) will have this value.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 34 mins (2015-06-30 12:45:22 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

we assign the value of power (1 - 2/5) = 0.6 (miss one word)

Alexander Teplitsky
Local time: 00:21
Works in field
Native speaker of: Russian
Notes to answerer
Asker: So you're putting "power" back in, unlike the other two answerers. I'm a mathematical illiterate, but to me "power" is when you multiply a number by itself, so two to the third power = 8. I don't see how to fit this concept into the sentence.


Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
disagree  Mikhail Kropotov: Нет экспонент здесь! Вчитайтесь в исходник.
1 hr

disagree  The Misha: Your English here is even murkier than your Russian. This definitely isn't about exponents.
13 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

5 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): +1
see expalanation below


Explanation:
This isn't really mathematical, it's a qualitative argument that I suggest phrasing as something like "this unit's degree of inclusion is (1 - 2/5) = 0.6"

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2015-06-30 18:30:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Possibly (lexemic) class membership is what is being referred to?

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2015-06-30 18:33:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I have no idea to what extent Vygotsky used "fuzzy membership" but that is [possibly related.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2015-06-30 18:46:35 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Fuzzy sets and logic are quite reputable :-) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Нечёткое_множество

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 hrs (2015-07-01 11:30:32 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Well done! My first reaction (a long time ago) was much the same as yours. It's currently used for quite interesting things in linguistics e.g. Marine De Cock discusses the modifier "more or less" in this context.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day4 hrs (2015-07-01 16:41:24 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------

I've worked all my life in Maths & Stats. Once one can identify the concept, it tends to be relatively straightforward to carry it across. One doesn't have niggly issues like Ambiguity, Register, Grammar etc to worry about :-)

DLyons
Ireland
Local time: 05:21
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: English
PRO pts in category: 28
Grading comment
Thanks! (For a guy who works in Spanish and French, which I don't, you certainly seem to turn up in every language pair that I do work in!)
Notes to answerer
Asker: Yes, that's right (class membership). He doesn't talk about "fuzzy membership," but the author of the article about Vygotsky talks about fuzzy logic and fuzzy set models. (Which sounds like a bunch of nonsense to me, but that's beside the point.)

Asker: Now I get it! (from the EN Wikipedia on fuzzy sets): "It has been suggested that Zadeh's ethnicity is an example of a fuzzy set because 'His father was Turkish-Iranian (Azerbaijani) and his mother was Russian. His father was a journalist working in Baku, Azerbaijan in the Soviet Union...Lotfi was born in Baku in 1921 and lived there until his family moved to Tehran in 1931.' "


Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  The Misha: This is about weights, not exponents, and that's what fuzzy sets are all about. That thing they are talking about is .6 carbs and .4 protein - which makes it tofu:)
8 hrs
  -> Thanks The Misha. The psychology of tofu - now that's cutting-edge research :-)
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search