@ MultiPro 20:52 Mar 21, 2016
Sadly, that simply doesn't fit with the EN source text.
For one thing, there is no justification whatsoever for adding in a spurious 'having', turning this relatively technical, formal document into what would be an everyday, lay-person's expression.
Secondly, that simply wouldn't make sense in the context of the clause as a whole! There would be no logic whatsoever in forbidding a party from entering "into any arrangement under which money or the benefit of having a bank or other account may be applied, set off or made subject to a combination of accounts;"
How could one possibly "apply, set off, or make subject to..." the fact of having an account?! |