Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. | GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | | English term or phrase: | "all costs rendered necessary by defects of material workmanship design plan or | | English translation: | all costs rendered necessary by defects of material, workmanship, design, plan, or specification | | Entered by: | Yasutomo Kanazawa |
| Options: - Contribute to this entry - Include in personal glossary
|
English to English translations [PRO] Insurance / Insurance | | English term or phrase: "all costs rendered necessary by defects of material workmanship design plan or | | Am I missing something, or is this phrase lacking proper punctuation? As part of an All Risk Construction Policy (CAR) I bumped into this beauty: "all costs rendered necessary by defects of material workmanship design plan or specification". I think it should read "defects of material, workmanship, design, plan or specification" but need some reassurance that I am actually interpreting it correctly. |
| ajperez50KudoZ activityQuestions: 5 (none open) Answers: 8
|
| | Selected response from:
Yasutomo Kanazawa Local time: 10:13
| Grading comment Selected automatically based on peer agreement. 4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer |
| |
| Discussion entries: 0 |
|---|
Automatic update in 00:
|
18 mins confidence:  peer agreement (net): +5 all costs rendered necessary by defects of material, workmanship, design, plan, or specification
Explanation: You are correct. There are commas missing after material, workmanship, and design like you pointed out. These commas serve to make clear that every term from material to specification is an independent term, where even one of those every terms mentioned apply to "all costs rendered necessary".
| | | Grading comment | Selected automatically based on peer agreement. |
| Notes to answerer
Asker: Thanks Yasutomo. I thought so but, as I said before, I needed the reassurance.
|
|
|
| |