Dear Gary, 11:50 Feb 13, 2009
I don't doubt your expertise in the subject. But as I mentioned, you cannot neglect the context.
The question was very precise and relevant: What does “rubdown” really mean here?
The point is, the original text was written by HW Armstrong, and he talked frequently about his X number of points or rules about life and good health. In these always referred to this hobbyhorse of his; the daily rubdown. Moreover, he always explained, what he meant by it, and where this wisdom was coming from.
Now I am suspicious about his findings regarding the centennarians and about their daily rubdown practice, but in his texts we have to accept his explanation about what he meant by the expression.
Besides, if there was a survey done by Taft's physio, and subsequently Armstrong wrote about it, it had to happen not later than in the 1950-s or 60-s. Therefore the people in question were born in the 1850-s or 60-s, when physical treatment did not reach the status and cult of ancient civilisations, - where of course, the massage was not available to everybody, but the young, fit sportsmen and the upper classes, whose slaves obliged. Also, the people of the survey lived through difficult times, particularly the great depression. It is unlikely that they would have been able to afford, or choose to spend their money on daily massage treatment year in, year out, for the best part of their life. It would be interesting to know, if there ever was a person who was lucky enough in his/her life to be able to receive a daily massage in all circumstances, even if they did not live to be a 100. On the other hand, I am sure that countless people can say that they had a wash-down and rub practically every day during their lifetime. |