Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
English to English translations [PRO]
Tech/Engineering | | English term or phrase: highly clustered | We have similar decisions to make here, meaning that if my two basic hardware technologies are going to be blades and mainframe, which applications deploy optimally on blades vs. mainframes?
In this case, we provide some guidelines.
The scale-out function can be done on the mainframe through zSeries virtualization technologies
But it may be better done, in some cases, with physical blade servers.
In the latter scenario, ideal blade applications would include:
***highly clustered*** workloads environments,
does it mean "environments arranged in many clusters"?
thanks! |
|  Elena GhettiKudoZ activityQuestions: 2611 ( 4 open) ( 31 without valid answers) ( 3 closed without grading) Answers: 2527
Italy
| | Local time: 08:26
|
| | deployed mainly in clusters | Explanation:
A cluster in this context is a specific computer server technology. It is based on connecting several servers together in such away that they appear to clients on the network as a single server. Within a cluster, the individual servers (called cluster members) can share application load, and most importantly provide high availablity (HA) in a way that is transparent to the clients connecting to the cluster. HA means that if a service (for example database server) is running on one cluster member and fails, the service is restarted on another cluster member (the term used is the application fails over to another member) and the service continues. The clients either do not notice at all, or experience a flicker in the service.
The text implies that the smaller blade servers will be deployed in clusters rather than running individually on their own. This will be an alternative to the single large mainframe for providing the scale out function.
So instead of the additional servers needed for scaling out being several mainframes, they will be several clusters, each consisting of a number of blade servers connected together internally.
HTH
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs 56 mins (2003-12-25 00:31:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
BTW, examples of popular cluster technology are Microsoft Wolfpack, Linux Beowulf, Compaq TruCluster, and HP ServiceGuard. |
| Selected response from:
 Alaa Zeineldine
Egypt
Local time: 09:26
| Grading comment thanks, perfectly clear now
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer |
| |
| Discussion entries: 0 |
|---|
Automatic update in 00:
|
27 mins confidence:   arranged in many clusters (in a high density of clusters)
Explanation:
Yes, I would think so.
Have a look at this link it might clarify a bit more.
Small-world Networks
... Regular networks are highly clustered, ie, there is a high density of connections
between nearby nodes, but have long path lengths, ie, to go from one distant ...
www.ams.org/new-in-math/small-world.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages
Merry Christmas!!
Grace
Reference: http://www.ams.org/new-in-math/small-world.html
| Graciela Carlyle
United Kingdom
Local time: 07:26
Native speaker of:  Spanish
PRO pts in pair: 8
|
| |
3 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +4 deployed mainly in clusters
Explanation:
A cluster in this context is a specific computer server technology. It is based on connecting several servers together in such away that they appear to clients on the network as a single server. Within a cluster, the individual servers (called cluster members) can share application load, and most importantly provide high availablity (HA) in a way that is transparent to the clients connecting to the cluster. HA means that if a service (for example database server) is running on one cluster member and fails, the service is restarted on another cluster member (the term used is the application fails over to another member) and the service continues. The clients either do not notice at all, or experience a flicker in the service.
The text implies that the smaller blade servers will be deployed in clusters rather than running individually on their own. This will be an alternative to the single large mainframe for providing the scale out function.
So instead of the additional servers needed for scaling out being several mainframes, they will be several clusters, each consisting of a number of blade servers connected together internally.
HTH
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs 56 mins (2003-12-25 00:31:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
BTW, examples of popular cluster technology are Microsoft Wolfpack, Linux Beowulf, Compaq TruCluster, and HP ServiceGuard.
| Alaa Zeineldine
Egypt
Local time: 09:26
Native speaker of:  Arabic, English
PRO pts in pair: 198
|
| | Grading comment | thanks, perfectly clear now |
|
|
|
| |
The translation workplace 
