GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
09:53 Oct 29, 2006 |
Czech to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Accounting / Act No. 337/1992 Coll. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Pavel Blann Czech Republic Local time: 05:55 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | (amount of) posted invoice |
| ||
3 | (total amount of) submitted invoice |
|
(total amount of) submitted invoice Explanation: Here is my take on what happened: The invoice submitted had different structure to the proforma invoice (list of items expected/agreed upon on the invoice). The customer is asking the supplier to explain the difference between the total of the submitted invoice and the amount expected if the proforma was used... Often a contract stipulates items that can be included on invoices, and amounts allowed to be charged for each item. If suppliers choose to go outside these agreed proforma invoices they need to explain why and how it happened - the total of submitted invoice is obviously higher than expected :-) A better and clearer explanation is not possible without having access to the actual documents... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(amount of) posted invoice Explanation: Zde jde např. o kontrolu finančního úřadu v účetnictví společnosti či organizace: daná faktura je již zaúčtována (posted), nikoli vystavena (submitted). -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 3 days35 mins (2006-11-01 10:29:15 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- rádo se stalo |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.