13:59 Feb 26, 2008 

I couln't care less about the points; I have enough of them :-)

13:49 Feb 26, 2008 

Yes, that would make sense. "Andere dan kaskosten" are expenses other than cash, but the English has a term for it, namely 'non-cash expenses' as indicated by Nanda. My answer was therefore correct and the glossary ought to be changed accordingly.

10:08 Feb 26, 2008 

The replies appear contradictory (non-cash vs. cash). And the other setences in the source also seem confusing.
The source sentence mentioned below is follwoed by the following: "Kaskosten zijn kosten die tot uitgaven of betalingen in het jaar zelf leiden. Andere dan kaskosten of niet-kaskosten leiden niet tot uitgaven of betalingen in het jaar zelf. Een voorbeeld van niet-kaskosten vormen afschrijvingen." But they said "andere dan kaskosten"!! Their explanation says kaskosten = cash costs. But then cash flow would be profit + non-cash costs (like depreciation). Does that make sense??