GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
09:08 Feb 8, 2007 |
Dutch to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Computers: Software / Software for banks | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Jack den Haan Netherlands Local time: 19:59 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | check points |
| ||
3 | control points |
| ||
3 | monitoring times |
| ||
3 | checkpoints |
| ||
3 | process monitoring checks |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
control points Explanation: is a possible solution? |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
monitoring times Explanation: Seems to be monitoring intervals, monitoring times - just a thought Reference: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cicsts/v3r1/index.j... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
checkpoints Explanation: I'd use 'checkpoints' here. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
check points Explanation: I think that 'check points' is what is meant here. 11.2.6 Runtime checks and profiling The setRuntimeOptionState, setRuntimeOption and clrRuntimeOption schemas can be used to change the amount of checking performed at runtime (if runtime checks are being performed at all). Schema setMaxCheckNestLevel determines how deeply checks will be performed. For example, if the setting is 2, runtime check points reached while running the program will be evaluated, also any check points reached whilst evaluating these check points will be evaluated; but runtime check points reached during this second-level evaluation will be skipped. http://www.eschertech.com/product_documentation/Language Ref... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
process monitoring checks Explanation: These 'check moments' are both checking a process and part of that process. Therefore, I would go for process monitoring checks, rather than including anything referring to a certain moment or point within the process (for this is already clarified by the rest of the sentence). |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.