Sentence comprehension

English translation: three parts joined by commas

01:43 Aug 29, 2008
English language (monolingual) [PRO]
Art/Literary - Cinema, Film, TV, Drama
English term or phrase: Sentence comprehension
Look at the film Beautiful Losers that Chris Green and Matt Shattuck produced: it’s all about that ethos of approaching things from the outside on multiple levels. The film gives a nod to Tom Waits by using his song “I Don’t Wanna Grow Up.” Tom is a collaborator of Bob’s, Chris Green’s company, Dissident, is involved in producing this portrait project with Bob and Nike is involved in both. It is all one thing really.

What does this sentence mean?
Edward LIU
Canada
Local time: 09:22
Selected answer:three parts joined by commas
Explanation:
It is three somewhat separate parts joined by commas:

1. Tom is a collaborator of Bob's.
2. Chris Green's company, Dissident, is involved in producing this portrait project with Bob.
3. Nike is involved in both.

Hope this helps.
Selected response from:

Margaret Schroeder
Mexico
Local time: 07:22
Grading comment
Thank you very much for your assistance.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED
4 +9three parts joined by commas
Margaret Schroeder


Discussion entries: 2





  

Answers


7 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +9
sentence comprehension
three parts joined by commas


Explanation:
It is three somewhat separate parts joined by commas:

1. Tom is a collaborator of Bob's.
2. Chris Green's company, Dissident, is involved in producing this portrait project with Bob.
3. Nike is involved in both.

Hope this helps.

Margaret Schroeder
Mexico
Local time: 07:22
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 4
Grading comment
Thank you very much for your assistance.

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  chaman4723
2 hrs

agree  Phong Le
2 hrs

agree  Demi Ebrite: It's unclear just who 'Bob' is; I thought maybe Bob Dylan, but I could find no connection - your breakout is perfectly clear!
2 hrs
  -> Same here regarding "Bob".

agree  Ken Cox: it would be clearer with semicolons after 'Bob's' and 'Bob'.
4 hrs
  -> Quite right; the rule is that if commas are contained within the clauses (as is the case here), then they should be separated by semicolons.

agree  kmtext
5 hrs

agree  Vlad Shamail (X)
5 hrs

agree  Sheila Wilson: I don't think it works at all with commas - it should be semi-colons.
6 hrs
  -> Yes, it should.

agree  BdiL: Provided today's scarce use of punctuation, seeing three commas looks like a miracle. At least a semicolon after "Bob's" would make up for a clearer sentence. Maurizio
11 hrs
  -> In fact, both commas separating the three parts should have been semicolons.

agree  Mónica Sauza
11 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search