GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00:34 Jan 5, 2002 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Selected response from: Maya Jurt Switzerland Local time: 16:04 | |||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +4 | Maybe you should ask Arabic speakers |
| ||
4 +4 | was consumed in an instant |
| ||
4 +3 | was destroyed in a moment |
| ||
4 +2 | was turned to dust in a moment |
| ||
5 | I do agree with all said before: It was destroyed in a moment |
|
was turned to dust in a moment Explanation: Obviously, "dust" and "ashes" are not the same, but the idea of the Arabic may be that the item was instantly destroyed. If the item was consumed by fire, then it was reduced to ashes; if it was pulverised, then it was reduced to dust. |
| ||||||||||
15 mins confidence: peer agreement (net): +3
|