08:45 Jun 30, 2003 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Tech/Engineering | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Matthew Fagan Japan Local time: 12:07 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | Operation of the valve... |
| ||
3 | It seems to be saying.... |
| ||
2 | COMMENT |
|
It seems to be saying.... Explanation: that the operating freq. has to be output(sent) first, etc - and that that causes the differential pressure to be acquired, which is needed for the activating the valve. It's a bit of a tortuous sentence "by having" - by already having done something. Best wishes Giuli -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-06-30 09:14:49 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Above is how I understand the order of events, anyway. The original sentence doesn\'t necessarily make clear that activation of the valve is the same thing as switching of the valve, or something that is happening at the same time - depends on the precise details of what is going on inside this valve ? -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-06-30 15:38:35 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Please note, the above seems sensible based on the English used, but is not based on in depth specialist knowledge of how this particular valve works :-) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-06-30 15:39:53 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Please note, the above seems sensible based on the English used, but is not based on in depth specialist knowledge of how this particular valve works :-) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-06-30 15:52:25 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Looking at it again, it could be read (from the English) with either the sequence of events the asker gave it, OR the one I suggested above, and other info. would be helpful to settle which. I hope Dusty\'s (wiser :-) head will settle it with his answer :-) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-07-01 09:53:22 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Sorry Mathew - you make it perfectly clear which meaning is meant :-)) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-07-01 09:57:59 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Sorry Mathew - you make it perfectly clear which meaning is meant :-)) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 day 15 mins confidence: peer agreement (net): +1
1 day 5 hrs confidence:
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question. You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. KudoZ™ translation helpThe KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also: Search millions of term translations |