  The translation workplace | |||
| |||
| |||||||||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs(or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
16 hrs confidence:  
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 hr peer agreement (net): +1 |
| Reference: bien vu Reference information: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Legal:Prior_Art#User_Wants_to_Recor... " * Prior Art Collected in Litigation. Defendants in patent litigation collect substantial volumes of prior art during the course of the case. These are in the form of documents, actual hardware or software items, and claim charts which describe how the references disclose elements of the patents in suit. These references are ideal sources of data to populate the prior art repository. In some cases, the prior art has already been coded electronically in a proprietary database, thus, the prior art repository should support some form of data import. * PACER Database. Case Files, such as those maintained on PACER in active federal court patent litigation contain a wealth of information. For example, answers to interrogatories often include a laundry list of potential prior art. To collect and maintain the most amount of information with limited input, it is necessary to tag and catalog these documents." |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
 |
