  The translation workplace | |||
| |||
| |||||||||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs(or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
49 mins confidence:  
5 hrs confidence:
20 hrs confidence:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 mins |
| Reference: סרט היסטורי על חיל המשלוח הבריטי Reference information: http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=24790 The British Expeditionary Force שנאלץ לשוב על עקבותיו במסגרת "נס דנקירק" מ-1940 -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2011-12-26 19:10:03 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- http://www.wordnik.com/words/expeditionary ספינות משלוח מתאים כאן לדעתי הסבר על SSDS SSDS Ship's Self Defense System (SSDS) is an integrated weapons system used aboard large U.S. Navy ships, such as Nimitz class supercarriers and various amphibious assault ships, such as LHDs and LSDs. SSDS is an integrated combat direction system (CDS). SSDS follows an open architecture approach and uses existing shipboard radars and weapons systems, integrated under a COTS framework, to provide a cohesive CDS. The first SSDS designs were backfit onto existing U.S. Navy ships. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2011-12-26 19:13:50 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- קטע ממאמר בעיתון הגארדיין הבריטי http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/23/michael-... They do not even suggest that the navy's two new aircraft carriers should be scrapped, trimmed or mothballed. It is too late for that. At 65,000 tonnes apiece, they are due to be completed at Rosyth (Brown did grasp constituency employment issues) for at least £4bn, by 2016-ish. The authors do insist that 21st-century "expeditionary" warfare will need versatile surface ships – and that defence is not a discretionary spending item even for impoverished coalitions. Over to you, Liam Fox. |
| ||
Note to reference poster
| |||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | |||
1 hr |
| Reference: ספינה רב-תכליתית Reference information: Whilst my military dictionary gives חיל משלוח for "expeditionary force", therefore logic might dictate something like what you suggested above. I agree that it lacks something intangible..... If Doron's link is accurate (my own research suggests it is) that an expeditionary ship is an amphibious, multipurpose, multifunction ship then perhaps something along the lines of ספינה רב-תכליתית might be possible. Or a variation on this. Reference: http://maarachot.idf.il/PDF/FILES/2/112312.pdf |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
 |
