14:42 Apr 18, 2009 

I don't think I'd care much to receive personal comments

18:04 Apr 16, 2009 

Zamknięciem tego bez przyznania punktów - i podania przyczyny - pokazałaś klasę, jaką reprezentujesz.

03:06 Apr 4, 2009 

I've been only interested in the possible notionality to the name; like Park Połoniński: branding?; you've got of course your right to your "brand notionality" :)

01:39 Apr 4, 2009 

For Temerity Woods in Ozarks, it is even more obvious that we are talking about branding her

01:37 Apr 4, 2009 

I am not sure if I follow your line of thinking; "Deep" in the name refers to "deep powder," and "temerity" is just a reference to a bold character of the terrain; this is not semantically empty, it is just not a name of any particular formation of the terrain, unlike "bowl," "gulch," or "ridge." When you Google it, you'll see it for yourself - no other "temerities," just this one; if in doubt, ask on the En > En forum, or call the resort;
BTW, next to it, Aspen Highlands has Steeplechase - just like that, and it is a pretty good description of what that part of the mountain looks like - but again, it is not a geographical name!

00:18 Apr 4, 2009 

it's just that people seem not to operate semantically empty items too often

00:17 Apr 4, 2009 

k; the frequency of use would still not render a geographical name semantically empty, this is why I have posted the question; probably hardly anybody thinks software (et al.) offering a trip to Temerity Woods or any temerity