GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
22:30 Oct 27, 2009 |
English to Polish translations [PRO] Science - Mathematics & Statistics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Selected response from: Polangmar Poland Local time: 08:17 | ||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | analiza wielostanowiskowa |
| ||
3 -1 | próba obrączkowa (wykrywania azotanów) |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
ref. |
|
Discussion entries: 8 | |
---|---|
próba obrączkowa (wykrywania azotanów) Explanation: Jeśli dotyczy chemii, to "próba obrączkowa". Jeśli dotyczy obróbki plastycznej (w co wątpię), to "próba pierścieniowa". Obydwa terminy pochodzą ze słownika technicznego WNT. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
analiza wielostanowiskowa Explanation: internal ring test - wewnętrzna/wewnątrzzakładowa analiza wielostanowiskowa external ring test - zewnętrzna analiza wielostanowiskowa Ewentualnie: - analiza wielomiejscowa -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 days23 hrs (2009-10-30 21:57:37 GMT) Post-grading -------------------------------------------------- Dziękuję.:) Przyszło mi do głowy, że do "external ring test" pasuje też: - analiza wieloośrodkowa Kłopot w tym, że wówczas straci się, w pewnym sensie, spójność terminologiczną. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
46 mins |
Reference: ref. Reference information: A recent ‘ring test’ between laboratories of various suppliers showed a wide variability between laboratories. The repetitive nature of the stirring required in the test lends itself to automation and thereby to improved reproducibility and repeatability. It was therefore decided to develop an automatic JCC test. (..) Results of ring tests were evaluated by the Analysis of Variance method using the ANOVA module within a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. (...) A further ring test (The External Ring Test) was then carried out comparing the Britannia Food Ingredients results with the results obtained by three companies who supply ingredient raw materials. All carried out essentially the same British Standard test and each laboratory was asked to analyse six samples in triplicate. Although the duplicate samples included were not significantly different, there were highly significant differences among the four laboratories. Overall, the External Ring Test showed much higher standard errors and confidence limits than found in the Internal Ring Test (Table 2). The confidence limits for Tmax, arguably the most important parameter recorded, was 0.75 compared with 0.33 for the Internal Ring Test. Some of the differences between laboratories were due to potentially controllable differences, e.g. use of metal stirrers instead of glass and lack of air conditioning, but it was concluded that the main reason for the high variability is the very subjective nature of the test. http://tinyurl.com/yghl78u http://tinyurl.com/yzy8rtg http://tinyurl.com/yl3tgty |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.