GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00:53 Apr 4, 2004 |
English to Portuguese translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Lúcia Lopes Brazil Local time: 07:03 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | identificação por alinhamento (ou enfileiramento) |
| ||
4 +3 | reconhecimento de suspeitos |
|
identificação por alinhamento (ou enfileiramento) Explanation: The defense application raises the additional problem of what a court can and should do if law enforcement violates an order for a sequential, double-blind line-up. Does a court have the ability to enforce a contempt citation if the police or the District Attorney fail to conduct a sequential line-up? Is an order for a sequential line-up within a court's purview? If a sequential line-up order were violated, is that a basis to suppress any identification that occurs in a simultaneous line-up held in defiance of a court directive to hold a sequential one? If a witness in a sequential line-up wishes to see a person whom it has already viewed, are the police allowed to grant the wish? If they permit a witness a second view, have they converted the line-up into a simultaneous one or into a new entity—a quasi-simultaneous one? If a witness views a person twice and selects the person is it suppressible or contemptible? If such an identification cannot be suppressed for violating a court order, is an order for a sequential line-up anything more than an advisory opinion? Until these questions are answered by an appellate court, this court is reluctant to begin directing law enforcement about how to conduct line-ups. Reference: http://www.google.com.br/search?q=cache:8_41savC7KUJ:www.cou... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||