Romanian translation: inofensiv/nevătămător/lipsit de nocivitate
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
10:21 Apr 9, 2010
English to Romanian translations [PRO] Environment & Ecology
Explanation: nevătămător/lipsit de nocivitate
dar poate fi si iritabil (în cantintăţi mari) deci depinde de context
...considered to be in the category of a nuisance dust, i.e., a dust that is generally innocuous and not recognized as the cause of
serious pathological conditions. http://www.cwc.org/plastic/pl977fs.pdf
aici nu e vorba de acidul boric dar explică bine la ce se referă 'nuisance dust' http://www.syntechproducts.com/syntech4.ivnu
Nuisance dust or inert dust can be defined as dust that contains less than 1% quartz. Because of its low content of silicates, nuisance dust has a long history of having little adverse effect on the lungs. Any reaction that may occur from nuisance dust is potentially reversible. However, excessive concentrations of nuisance dust in the workplace may reduce visibility (e.g., iron oxide), may cause unpleasant deposits in eyes, cars, and nasal passages (e.g., portland cement dust), and may cause injury to the skin or mucous membranes by chemical or mechanical action.
În funcţie de criteriile de clasificare sunt mai multe tipuri http://www.syntechproducts.com/syntech4.ivnu
Fibrogenic dust such as free crystalline silica (FCS) or asbestos, is biologically toxic and, if retained in the lungs, can form scar tissue and impair the lungs' ability to function properly.
Nuisance dust or inert dust can be defined as dust that contains less than 1% quartz. Because of its low content of silicates, nuisance dust has a long history of having little adverse effect on the lungs. Any reaction that may occur from nuisance dust is potentially reversible. However, excessive concentrations of nuisance dust in the workplace may reduce visibility (e.g., iron oxide), may cause unpleasant deposits in eyes, cars, and nasal passages (e.g., portland cement dust), and may cause injury to the skin or mucous membranes by chemical or mechanical action.
From an occupational health point of view, dust is classified by size into three primary categories:
Sunt de acord ca nu reactioneaza, dar nu numai chimic, ci in orice fel, deci nu are actiune asupra corpului omenesc. Reactiile corpului omenesc sunt chimice. (oxigen, CO2, Fe, Na, K, H2O,etc)
Astfel de texte m-au facut sa aleg INERT, pentru ca este mentionat ca atare in literatura de specialitate in SUA, Franta si Romania. Cel mai mult m-a determinat faptul ca in mine (tatal meu a lucrat in mina) se foloseste foarte des termenul de praf inert.http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz...
Fibrogenic dust such as free crystalline silica (FCS) or asbestos, is biologically toxic and, if retained in the lungs, can form scar tissue and impair the lungs' ability to function properly.
Nuisance dust or inert dust can be defined as dust that contains less than 1% quartz. Because of its low content of silicates, nuisance dust has a long history of having little adverse effect on the lungs. Any reaction that may occur from nuisance dust is potentially reversible. However, excessive concentrations of nuisance dust in the workplace may reduce visibility (e.g., iron oxide), may cause unpleasant deposits in eyes, cars, and nasal passages (e.g., portland cement dust), and may cause injury to the skin or mucous membranes by chemical or mechanical action.
From an occupational health point of view, dust is classified by size into three primary categories:
Respirable dust
Inhalable dust
Total dust
De acord. Este neplăcut/supărător.În cantităţi mai mari, este iritant şi se poate sublinia acest fapt-că nu este nociv în cantităţi mici dar iritant în cantităţi mai mari. Cred că e vorba de o clasificare şi din câte am înţeles, există şi total nuisance dust după anumite standarde.Este foarte greu de determinat în lipsă de mai mult context
The following analytical methods are used:
· Respirable nuisance dust: NIOSH 0600
· Total nuisance dust: NIOSH 0500 http://www.cwc.org/plastic/pl977fs.pdf
Eu tind sa cred ca e vorba despre diferenta dintre nuisance and hazard. Riscul/periculozitatea pot fi grave, vatamatoare sanatatii, iar nuisance (disconfortul), cel putin sub anumite limite, nu implica pericole asupra sanatatii.
Eu as include acest aspect in traducere: pulberi disconfortante.
Un articol partial accesibil imi confirma aceasta banuiala: http://www.scribd.com/doc/8756588/Igiena-mediului-Rezumat
Clasificarea de aici distinge urmatoarele: pragul efectului nul, pragul disconfortant si pragul de nocivitate (apoi pragul de urgenta).
Cred ca nuisance-ul nostru echivaleaza cu pragul disconfortant.
Dear colleagues, please look into it. You know about being subjective, each of us thinks about one term or another as being "the right one". Please look at each explanation and reasoning without any biases.
Note: I use mostly English in my posts because I have to keep my keyboard on English mostly, so I don't have diacritical characters, and it doesn't look good without them.
Secondly, I considered the term INERT as being "neutral" in this context, not pushing either in the NEGATIVE direction, like harmful/dangerous nor in POZITIVE direction, like this "nuisance" as "not harmful/not bad/inoffensive", because the "nuisance" behavior in normal life is something bothering....but not killing you.
Alina,
din documentul atasat, citat din OSHA, se pare ca "The boric acid is not harmful, NOT HAZARDOUS" to humans", deci NU este periculos, primejdios, s.a.m.d.
Este un praf inert, conform celor doua clasificari pe care le-am prezentat.
Terminologia de "praf inert" se foloseste in mine, fabrici de ciment, fabrici de chimicale, etc.
Atunci cand este un accident si asa mai departe se vorbeste de concentratia de praf inert". Am dat exemplu in postare.
Inert este potrivit (consider eu) pentru ca a fost definit ca atare si in engleza si accentueaza aspectul ca NU face rau decat in cantitati mari.
Am găsit o definiţie pentru "nuisance dust", o redau mai jos.
Termenul reţinut în franceză e "poussières nuisibles"
"Nuisance particulates is a term used by the ACGIH to describe airborne materials (solids and liquids) which have little harmful effect on the lungs and do not produce significant disease or harmful effects when exposures are kept under reasonable control. Nuisance particulates may also be called nuisance dusts. High levels of nuisance particulates in the air may reduce visibility and can get into the eyes, ears and nose. Removal of this material by washing or rubbing may cause irritation"
Depinde într-adevăr de context, dacă e inofensiv sau dăunător.
nevătămător/lipsit de nocivitate
dar poate fi si iritabil (în cantintăţi mari) deci depinde de context
...considered to be in the category of a nuisance dust, i.e., a dust that is
generally innocuous and not recognized as the cause of
serious pathological conditions. http://www.cwc.org/plastic/pl977fs.pdf
Occupational Exposure Limits: Boric Acid is listed/regulated by OSHA, Cal OSHA and ACGIH as "Particulate Not Otherwise Classified" or "Nuisance Dust." http://www.lewisu.edu/academics/biology/pdf/boric_acid_dry.p...
Acid has a relatively low acute toxicity. Small amounts (e.g., a teaspoonful) swallowed accidentally are not likely to cause effects; swallowing amounts larger than that may cause gastrointestinal symptoms.
www.americanborate.com/uploads/Boric_Acid-MSDS.doc
Va rog sa adaugati putin la context, sau sa precizati din ce fel de document face parte. "praf daunator" mi se pare prea general si literar. In mediile de munca este foarte important sa se precizeze ca este "inert", deci nu este toxic. Multumesc.
Automatic update in 00:
Answers
7 mins confidence:
praf toxic
Explanation: Acidul boric există şi sub formă de praf.
"Acidul boric se tratează ca un praf toxic."
Andreea Boldura Romania Local time: 06:46 Works in field Native speaker of: Romanian
Explanation: http://www.dspbr.ro/legislatie/ordin536.htm
c) amenajarea traseelor se va face în aşa fel încât să se reducă la minimum impactul poluanţilor asupra sănătăţii publice (linii de tramvai insonorizat, pavimente din materiale care să nu producă zgomot şi să nu elibereze în atmosferă substanţe chimice sau pulberi periculoase..
Annamaria Amik Local time: 06:46 Specializes in field Native speaker of: Hungarian, Romanian PRO pts in category: 4
The translation workplace 
peer agreement (net): +2
