Russian translation: постоянное (непрерывное) рассмотрение вопроса о доступе к материалам дела
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
00:55 Nov 26, 2009
English to Russian translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general)
English term or phrase:continuing review
Доброго времени суток
Cases will arise in which the appointment of an approved advocate as special counsel is
necessary, in the interests of justice, to secure protection of a criminal defendant's right to
a fair trial. Such an appointment does however raise ethical problems, since a lawyer who cannot take full instructions from his client, nor report to his client, who is not responsible to his client and whose relationship with the client lacks the quality of confidence inherent
in any ordinary lawyer-client relationship, is acting in a way hitherto unknown to the legal profession. While not insuperable, these problems should not be ignored, since neither the defendant nor the public will be fully aware of what is being done. The appointment
is also likely to cause practical problems: of delay, while the special counsel familiarises himself with the detail of what is likely to be a complex case; of expense, since the introduction of an additional, high-quality advocate must add significantly to the cost of the case; and of continuing review, since it will not be easy for a special counsel to assist the court in its continuing duty to review disclosure, unless the special counsel is present
throughout or is instructed from time to time when need arises.
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 19 mins (2009-11-26 01:14:32 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
Нашла ваш страшный документ:
The disclosure function resembles the approach devised by the Courts to deal with Public Interest Immunity claims. However, there are some important differences. In civil or criminal proceedings disputes about disclosure are concerned with what materials should be available to a party to litigate the case. If material is not disclosed it forms no part of that case, and does not lead to a secret trial.[48] There is also no balancing test. Once the Home Secretary has decided on the classification of material because of the 'real harm' that would stem from its disclosure, there is no further consideration by him as to whether or not it should be disclosed due to 'fair trial' considerations. This is compounded by the fact that SIAC has no power to consider whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the public interest in secrecy.[49] To this extent, the SIAC system represents a considerable weakening of the judicial protection available under the common law Public Interest Immunity rules. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/c...
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 21 mins (2009-11-26 01:17:00 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
Задача вашего специального защитника постоянно ставить под сомнение запрет на разглашение информации и выносить это на рассмотрение суда (по-моему в ваших предыдущих вопросах уже был пример, когда можно оспорить запрет: если лицо принимало участие в "добыче" той информации, которую прокуратура использует против обвиняемого, то это лицо может просить суд открыть доступ к таким материалам).
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 22 mins (2009-11-26 01:17:57 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
Чем с большего объема информации будет снят запрет, тем больше у этого защитника есть возможности сообщить своему подзащитному, а, следовательно, тем больше шансов выиграть дело.
A Special Advocate is a specially appointed lawyer (typically, a barrister) who is instructed to
represent a person's interests in relation to material that is kept secret from that person (and his
ordinary lawyers) but analysed by a court or equivalent body at an adversarial hearing held in
private. The Special Advocate has the advantage that he can go behind the curtain of secrecy,
but also considerable disadvantages.
Подсудимый лишен доступа к материалам обвинения из-за соображений защиты общественных интересов. Но ему могут назначить специального защитник, который может присутствовать на закрытых заседаниях (когда обвинение просит у суда разрешения не раскрывать подсудимому материалы обвинения). Спец. защитник должен помогать подсудимому, но не может раскрывать ему эти материалы.
постоянное (непрерывное) рассмотрение вопроса о доступе к материалам дела
Explanation: Как-то так, исходя из ваших цитат.
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 19 mins (2009-11-26 01:14:32 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
Нашла ваш страшный документ:
The disclosure function resembles the approach devised by the Courts to deal with Public Interest Immunity claims. However, there are some important differences. In civil or criminal proceedings disputes about disclosure are concerned with what materials should be available to a party to litigate the case. If material is not disclosed it forms no part of that case, and does not lead to a secret trial.[48] There is also no balancing test. Once the Home Secretary has decided on the classification of material because of the 'real harm' that would stem from its disclosure, there is no further consideration by him as to whether or not it should be disclosed due to 'fair trial' considerations. This is compounded by the fact that SIAC has no power to consider whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the public interest in secrecy.[49] To this extent, the SIAC system represents a considerable weakening of the judicial protection available under the common law Public Interest Immunity rules. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/c...
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 21 mins (2009-11-26 01:17:00 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
Задача вашего специального защитника постоянно ставить под сомнение запрет на разглашение информации и выносить это на рассмотрение суда (по-моему в ваших предыдущих вопросах уже был пример, когда можно оспорить запрет: если лицо принимало участие в "добыче" той информации, которую прокуратура использует против обвиняемого, то это лицо может просить суд открыть доступ к таким материалам).
-------------------------------------------------- Note added at 22 mins (2009-11-26 01:17:57 GMT) --------------------------------------------------
Чем с большего объема информации будет снят запрет, тем больше у этого защитника есть возможности сообщить своему подзащитному, а, следовательно, тем больше шансов выиграть дело.