GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
22:28 Mar 22, 2007 |
English to Spanish translations [PRO] Medical - Medical (general) / cirugía | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Maria Elena Martinez Netherlands Local time: 21:17 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
a protocolo de lavado (/ "washout") revisionado Explanation: Direct translation. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
a quienes se les sometío al protocolo/período de reposo farmacológico de revisión Explanation: También: a quienes se les sometío a un protocolo de revisión de lavado/reposo farmacológico Texto completo: ResúmenesDurante un período de 2,5 años, entraron en el estudio todos los casos nuevos de asma ... separados por un período de reposo farmacológico de una semana. ... www.separ.es/cgi-bin/wdbcgi.exe/erj/mrevista.fulltext?piden... - 371k - En caché - Páginas similares |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
protocolo de irrigación/lavado en cirugías de revisión Explanation: En este caso, parece ser una especie de irrigación o lavado que se realiza en las zonas de los implantes en cirugías de revisión, Espero te sirva! PURPOSE: Reoperation of penile implants carries a higher risk of infection (7% to 18%). Positive cultures and visible bacterial biofilm have been shown to be present on clinically uninfected inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) at revision. A salvage irrigation protocol has proved to rescue patients with a clinically infected IPP. During revision surgery for noninfectious reasons we investigated washing out the implant space at revision surgery and using an antibiotic coated replacement prosthesis to determine if it would decrease subsequent infection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 3 institutions 183 patients with a penile prosthesis underwent revision surgery for noninfectious reasons between June 2001 and October 2003. Of these patients 140 had the entire implant removed and then underwent antiseptic solution lavage of the implant spaces (revision washout), followed by replacement with a 3 piece IPP. This revision washout is a modification of the original Mulcahy salvage procedure. In the remaining 43 patients the implant was removed but they did not undergo antiseptic irrigation before replacement with an antibiotic coated IPP. Patients were followed for 6 to 33 months, while observing for failure. RESULTS: Four of the 140 patients (2.86%) who underwent removal of the entire implant with irrigation of the implant spaces with antiseptic solutions and replacement with an IPP have had infection. In the remaining group Example sentence(s):
|
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.