non-certificated holdings

Swedish translation: innehav utan aktiebrev

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
English term or phrase:non-certificated holdings
Swedish translation:innehav utan aktiebrev
Entered by: Karin Ashing

08:19 Jan 26, 2004
English to Swedish translations [PRO]
Bus/Financial
English term or phrase: non-certificated holdings
fortf. beskrivning av en fond. Sammanhang:

Non-certificated holdings make it simpler and faster for you to convert funds or make withdrawals.

Står det för:
Ej intecknade innehav, eller?
Karin Ashing
Sweden
Local time: 07:20
se förklaring
Explanation:
non-certificated betyder att det inte finns något certifikat = dokument som är direkt knutet till innehavet - typ aktiebrev.
I stället får man ett slags certifikatnummer som måste uppges vid transaktioner.
Man behöver alltså inte visa upp ngt bevis på ägarskapet utan anger bara detta nummer när man vill "casha" in de pengar som finns bundna i innehavet.

Jag skall se om jag hittar ngt belägg för detta på Google så jag återkommer


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs 34 mins (2004-01-26 15:54:13 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Jodå, det finns ganska många förklaringar om du letar på non-certificated.

Den första jag fick upp har en bra förklaring på skillnaden (se adress nedan)

Men vad det kallas på svenska: man talar om \"aktiebrevslösa\" bolag där aktierna registreras in i innehavarens namn hos ngn bank eller dyligt så att vederbörande kan handla/köpa-sälja snabbt och inte behöver hålla på med hantering av fysiska dokument.

Men jag vet inte om det handlar om aktier i ditt fall.
Kanske \"dokumentlöst innehav\" eller \"innehav där ägandet inte bevisas genom ett fysiskt dokument\" (inte så snyggt, men...).


Advice Bank: Online Share Dealing - email -

... Certificated versus non certificated Very few online brokers offer clients the facility to hold certificates in their own name. ...
www.thisismoney.com/ advice/sharedealing/certificated_versus_non-certificated.htm







Certificated versus non certificated
Very few online brokers offer clients the facility to hold certificates in their own name. The main advantage of holding your own certificates is that you don\'t have to sell the shares via the broker you bought them through. Your name appears on the company register which means that dividends are sent directly to you in the form of a cheque or nominated to a bank account of your choice. Any documentation such as takeover announcements, restructuring proposals and the Report and Accounts are sent directly to you and you can benefit from any shareholder perks. You also have the added security of knowing that no-one can sell your shares without your knowledge.

The disadvantage of holding share certificates is that settlement usually takes longer. With most online broking accounts, you can sell a share and use the proceeds to buy another share at the same time. If you hold the certificates for a share, sale proceeds will not be released until the stock exchange has received both the certificate and a duly signed stock transfer form. Problems can arise if, for example, you want to sell shares when you are on holiday. The stock transfer form would generally be sent to your home address and you probably wouldn\'t be holding your share certificates. The other main disadvantage of holding your own certificates is that you end up dealing with far more paperwork.

The majority of online brokers will hold your certificates in a nominee account on your behalf. All documentation goes directly to the broker and is only forwarded on to you if some action needs to be taken. When dividends are received or shares sold, the proceeds are automatically paid into your trading account or nominee bank account. Most online brokers charge an annual administration fee to handle the paperwork associated with your account, but some offer the service for free.



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs 38 mins (2004-01-26 15:57:25 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Jag hittade det här:

Juridisk Tidskrift
... Något om lagvalsregler vid pantsättning av **dokumentlösa finansiella instrument**

DET låter väl snyggt!!

Se:
www.juridisktidskrift.org/ listart.asp?what=2&value=Artikel

Selected response from:

Rottie (X)
Local time: 06:20
Grading comment
Tusen tack för ditt uttömmande svar och alla dina ansträngningar!
Karin
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
4se förklaring
Rottie (X)


  

Answers


7 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
se förklaring


Explanation:
non-certificated betyder att det inte finns något certifikat = dokument som är direkt knutet till innehavet - typ aktiebrev.
I stället får man ett slags certifikatnummer som måste uppges vid transaktioner.
Man behöver alltså inte visa upp ngt bevis på ägarskapet utan anger bara detta nummer när man vill "casha" in de pengar som finns bundna i innehavet.

Jag skall se om jag hittar ngt belägg för detta på Google så jag återkommer


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs 34 mins (2004-01-26 15:54:13 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Jodå, det finns ganska många förklaringar om du letar på non-certificated.

Den första jag fick upp har en bra förklaring på skillnaden (se adress nedan)

Men vad det kallas på svenska: man talar om \"aktiebrevslösa\" bolag där aktierna registreras in i innehavarens namn hos ngn bank eller dyligt så att vederbörande kan handla/köpa-sälja snabbt och inte behöver hålla på med hantering av fysiska dokument.

Men jag vet inte om det handlar om aktier i ditt fall.
Kanske \"dokumentlöst innehav\" eller \"innehav där ägandet inte bevisas genom ett fysiskt dokument\" (inte så snyggt, men...).


Advice Bank: Online Share Dealing - email -

... Certificated versus non certificated Very few online brokers offer clients the facility to hold certificates in their own name. ...
www.thisismoney.com/ advice/sharedealing/certificated_versus_non-certificated.htm







Certificated versus non certificated
Very few online brokers offer clients the facility to hold certificates in their own name. The main advantage of holding your own certificates is that you don\'t have to sell the shares via the broker you bought them through. Your name appears on the company register which means that dividends are sent directly to you in the form of a cheque or nominated to a bank account of your choice. Any documentation such as takeover announcements, restructuring proposals and the Report and Accounts are sent directly to you and you can benefit from any shareholder perks. You also have the added security of knowing that no-one can sell your shares without your knowledge.

The disadvantage of holding share certificates is that settlement usually takes longer. With most online broking accounts, you can sell a share and use the proceeds to buy another share at the same time. If you hold the certificates for a share, sale proceeds will not be released until the stock exchange has received both the certificate and a duly signed stock transfer form. Problems can arise if, for example, you want to sell shares when you are on holiday. The stock transfer form would generally be sent to your home address and you probably wouldn\'t be holding your share certificates. The other main disadvantage of holding your own certificates is that you end up dealing with far more paperwork.

The majority of online brokers will hold your certificates in a nominee account on your behalf. All documentation goes directly to the broker and is only forwarded on to you if some action needs to be taken. When dividends are received or shares sold, the proceeds are automatically paid into your trading account or nominee bank account. Most online brokers charge an annual administration fee to handle the paperwork associated with your account, but some offer the service for free.



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs 38 mins (2004-01-26 15:57:25 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Jag hittade det här:

Juridisk Tidskrift
... Något om lagvalsregler vid pantsättning av **dokumentlösa finansiella instrument**

DET låter väl snyggt!!

Se:
www.juridisktidskrift.org/ listart.asp?what=2&value=Artikel



Rottie (X)
Local time: 06:20
Native speaker of: Native in SwedishSwedish
PRO pts in pair: 361
Grading comment
Tusen tack för ditt uttömmande svar och alla dina ansträngningar!
Karin
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search