GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
18:11 Jul 16, 2002 |
Flemish to French translations [PRO] Law/Patents | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Bart B. Van Bockstaele Canada Local time: 04:35 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 | citation introductive d'instance |
|
citation introductive d'instance Explanation: dagwaarding is een fout. Het moet dagvaarding zijn. en het moet ook zijn: "gelet op" "gelet of " is verkeerd. Reference: http://www.barreaudeliege.be/editions/juridictions/demande%2... Reference: http://www.lftdev.com/pw/fr/jurisprudence/Nivelles_.htm |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.