20:57 Oct 16 

Sadly, AFAIK, mods can't intervene on personal glossaries — you could always submit a support ticket, but I rather think it would be a HUGE task, trying to correct all the erros in personal glossaries!

12:33 Oct 16 

There is a personal glossary entry (erroneous) with "charming, charmingly, delightful, lovely" as definitions for "irritant." I dug a little deeper, and it seems the owner is no longer involved in Proz. The glossary has 35000+ entries, but most have no definitions. So, it's just taking up space and, in this case, giving bad info. Perhaps one of our moderators could take a look and suggest a clean-up.

09:05 Oct 16 

Nothing wrong. It's a table.

08:17 Oct 16 

Thanks for all your help. The document is full of errors such as the "haute" one. Although I had never heard of "irritant" meaning anything other than annoying etc., there is a glossary entry giving it as "charming, delightful..." which confused me.

08:13 Oct 16 

I had assumed this was probably an abbreviation of 'hautement', give that space might be limited in this table.

08:12 Oct 16 

it is not a matter of it being irritating to have to make improvements but more a value judgement on the extent to which the particular problem requiring improvement is serious - in some cases, something or other clearly gets under the end client's skin, in others it is a sensitive area for big clients and in the last case the problem gets on the nerves on "clients" within the company

08:09 Oct 16 

"irritant" is never "charming" etc. but then "haute irritant" (sic) is total nonsense in French. You could say 'fort irritant" or some such thing but never "haute" with an "e" on the end - however, they are clearly talking about major/minor issues

08:00 Oct 16 

charming and delightful have nothing to do with irritant (French for annoying, irritating, ...).
If "haute - irritant - client final" are under three different headings, it may just qualify the importance given to the problem by the customer, as Tony noted.