15:09 Jul 7, 2010 

You really don't give us enough context to work wiht, but we're all assuming I think that 'chariots' refers to 'forklifts', and that the 'gerbeurs' are a special kind of forklift — since it seems you need to distinguish between them, then maybe it would be best to use 'stackers' here.

Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, 'chariot' is very unlikely to be either 'truck' or 'crane'. But you are about the only person who actually knows what your document is about.

13:54 Jul 7, 2010 

from the images below, "forklift" and "stacker" are nearly synonymous, though to make a distinction between the smaller stacker and the larger forklift truck, you could simply put "forklift stacker"!
http://www.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=forklift stacker&um=1...

13:50 Jul 7, 2010 

If it is forklifts then what is chariot...The context starts with Ces deux chariots sont connus à travers le monde pour leur performance et fiabilité remarquables ainsi que pour leur entretien facile
So shall chariots are simply trucks/cranes

13:48 Jul 7, 2010 

I agree with u
1. leuriabilité is wrong, it is fiabilité
2. RS series Thanks Tony

13:42 Jul 7, 2010 

I did initially put this, but thought it sufficiently evident to exclude it!
It may be worth pointing out (though this may be a transcription error) that "leuriabilité" is, of course, an unintended contraction of leur fiabilité!!

13:33 Jul 7, 2010 

It should of course be 'RS-series ...' — the 'série' belongs with the 'RS' and not with the 'gerbeurs'