  The translation workplace | |||
| |||
| |||||||||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs(or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
4 mins confidence:   peer agreement (net): +1
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 hrs peer agreement (net): +1 |
| Reference: "avec la mission habituelle" Reference information: Selon l’article 265 du code de procédure civile, la décision qui ordonne l’expertise définit avec précision la mission de l’expert. Il arrive que le demandeur se limite à solliciter la désignation d’un expert « avec la mission habituelle », formule dénuée de portée. (Rapport de la commission de réflexion sur l’expertise, mars 2011) Reference: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/1_rapp_com_reflextion_exp... |
| ||
Note to reference poster
| |||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | |||
| Changes made by editors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 |
