00:45 Dec 1, 2009 

Hi Anke, alles klar. :-)
Probably not worth pursuing this further, and explaining what I meant, so I won't. Ciao, C

07:55 Nov 30, 2009 

Hello Cilian, if you read my last discussion comment you see why I didn't grade anyone. Unfortunately there is no option to give points to more than one person, which I would have had to do in this case. Besides there wasn't one right or wrong answer, they all helped in finding a solution.
I also don't think entering what I chose to use in the glossary would be such a great idea, since it fits my specific situation, but there are other terms, that may fit other situations etc.
Also, if anyone is looking for "Tilgergewicht", he/she will also find this page, including all possible solutions and discussions.
I don't like not giving points, but in this case it would be hard and really unfair to pick one over the other, since both suggestions are right.

00:12 Nov 30, 2009 

The term would go in the glossary if you selected whichever answer you found most helful. You could e.g. give Bernd the points and enter all suggestions.

08:15 Nov 4, 2009 

I'm going to go with this solution, since the other terms are all good, but this makes it even clearer, and I also found plenty of websites where "vibration damper weight" was used in an automotive context, whereas the others weren't.

18:30 Nov 2, 2009 

und zwar laut des Eintrags in IATE:
Terminus - vibration damper, damper weight, balance weight ; Zuverlässigkeit - 3 (Zuverlässig) ; Quelle - Audi Germany Workshop Manual Terminology, EN Translation Dep., 08.07.99 ; Anmerkung - Audi comment: Use this terminology carefully .


Your thoughts?