10:00 Feb 8, 2007 |
German to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Law: Contract(s) / equipment installation services contracts | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Axel Seyler (X) Local time: 15:30 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | Barring of claims by the Statute of Limitation does not apply in the case of wilful conduct. |
| ||
4 | time-barring cannot be claimed where action is deliberate |
| ||
4 | Statute of limitation does not apply in case of willful behavior |
|
time-barring cannot be claimed where action is deliberate Explanation: Claims for faulty installation for example would normally have to be made within a certain time-limit, and outside this limit any claim would be "time-barred", in other words insubmissible. Where it can be demonstrated that the contractor has acted deliberately or with "malicious intent", then such a claim is NOT subject to time-barring. |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Statute of limitation does not apply in case of willful behavior Explanation: I think that's more or less it |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Barring of claims by the Statute of Limitation does not apply in the case of wilful conduct. Explanation: However, in the context of the sentence given, I would say: "The period of limitation for asserting a claim will not be shortened in cases of wilful conduct." |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.