Translators - Translator Resources
ProZ.com global directory of translation services
 The translation workplace

German: Antragsgegner(in)

English translation: opponent (Antragsgegner), as opposed to petitioner (Antragsteller)







KudoZ
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators... More



GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
German term or phrase:Antragsgegner(in)
English translation:opponent (Antragsgegner), as opposed to petitioner (Antragsteller)
Entered by:David Wallace
Options:
- Contribute to this entry

11:30pm Apr 22, 2004Login or register (free) for more options.
German to English translations [PRO]
Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright
German term or phrase: Antragsgegner(in)
Respondent (from glossary) doesn't sound right (at least in American English).
Here is the context:
Die Antragstellerin beantragt, den Beschluss zu bestätigen.
Die Antragsgegnerin beantragt, den Beschluss zurückzuweisen.

Antragstellerin = claimant (glossary)
Antragsgegnerin = respondent (glossary)

Are these terms interchangeable with plaintiff and defendant (Kläger und Beklagter)?
Thanks!
David Wallace
United States
Clarification request(s) and response
Kim Metzger: 11:32pm Apr 22, 2004: Is it a criminal or a civil case? -
Johanna Timm, PhD: 11:38pm Apr 22, 2004: Petitioner<> respondent is used in divorce proceedings -
xxxKirstyMacC: 4:36pm Apr 23, 2004: Is this a patents or injunction application etc. case? Parties' names also change. -
David Wallace (asker): 6:24pm Apr 23, 2004: Trademark case - This is a trademark infringement case (i.e., a civil case).

petitioner (Antragsteller) and opponent (Antragsgegner)
Explanation:
according to the Dictionary of Patent Terms (Klaften/Wittmann/Klos). As Kim says, "adverse party" is also a possibility for "Antragsgegner", but if your text relates to a patent dispute I would not use "applicant" for "Antragsteller", which is also given in the above dictionary.
Selected response from:

Edward L. Crosby III
United States
Note from asker to answerer
Thank you very much!
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
4 +1petitioner (Antragsteller) and opponent (Antragsgegner)
Edward L. Crosby III
4 +1OpponentDavid Moore
3 +1adverse party
Kim Metzger
3conter-claimant
Narasimhan Raghavan


  

Answers

4 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): +1
adverse party

Explanation:
One possibility.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2004-04-22 23:36:45 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Antragssteller could be applicant, petitioner, petioning party


    Hamblock/Wessels
Kim Metzger
Mexico
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 154

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree Edward L. Crosby III: If it's a dispute, I'd use "petitioner". Your "adverse party" confirmed in Klaften/Wittmann/Klos (see my note).
10 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


1 hr   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
conter-claimant

Explanation:
See: PDF] United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nos. 95-3377 to ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... Woodman, Seaman Apprentice, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED
STATES of America, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross ...
www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/19953377.OPA.pdf - Similar pages

Narasimhan Raghavan
India
Native speaker of: Native in TamilTamil
PRO pts in category: 3
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


10 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +1
Opponent

Explanation:
If you feed google with '"Patent law"; dispute; applicant; opponent', you will be offered 386 hits; I'm not going to claim they are all jake, but a good number of them look very convincing. OTOH, you can replace the "opponent" with "counter-claimant" etc., and see what is offered.

David Moore
Germany
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 32

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree Edward L. Crosby III: Guess I was typing when you posted.
3 mins
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)


10 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +1
petitioner (Antragsteller) and opponent (Antragsgegner)

Explanation:
according to the Dictionary of Patent Terms (Klaften/Wittmann/Klos). As Kim says, "adverse party" is also a possibility for "Antragsgegner", but if your text relates to a patent dispute I would not use "applicant" for "Antragsteller", which is also given in the above dictionary.

Edward L. Crosby III
United States
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 4
Note from asker to answerer
Thank you very much!

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree xxxKirstyMacC: Appicant for patents.
6 hrs
  -> Thanks, Counsel. I'm assuming that patent law is the issue here, but maybe that's not correct.
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)





Return to KudoZ list