German: AugmentatEnglish translation: augmentation material(s) 
KudoZ The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators ... More  |
|
German to English translations [PRO]
Medical - Medical: Dentistry / Implantology; Membranes | | German term or phrase: Augmentat | "Resorbierbare Substanzen können ferner, z.B. in Kombination mit PRP, zu einem beschleunigten Abbau von ***Augmentat*** und ortsständigem Knochen durch phagozytierende Zellen führen. In der Parodontologie sollen die sich schnell teilenden Epithel- und Bindegewebezellen durch eine mechanische Barriere daran gehindert werden, einen knöchernen Defekt noch vor dem langsam wachsenden Knochen zu besiedeln (GTR). In der Implantologie werden Membranen zusätzlich zur Hohlraumbildung für das Knochenwachstum (GBR) und zur mechanischen Stabilisierung des ***Augmentats*** eingesetzt. In der augmentativen Chirurgie kommt der ausreichend langen Standzeit der Membran eine hohe Bedeutung zu."
From a text about bone augmentation and what-not. What exactly is "Augmentat"? I've never been able to find a proper translation for this word. I tend to think it's augmented material, but would like to know for sure. TIA for your help. |
| | | augmentation materials | Explanation:
[PDF] Sinusbodenelevation und -augmentation
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
... einzeitige oder zweizeitige SBEA und Implantation nicht (7 ... studies,reviews), and
language (German or English). ... an vitalem Knochen im **Augmentat** zeitabhängig zu ...
www.springerlink.com/index/GMJ2F6RNGY98TPY7.pdf
The average duration of the healing period was 6 months (AB) and 8 months (BSM) with simultaneous SFEA and implantation and 6–7 months (AB and BSM) for the staged approach after an average healing period of 6 months for the **augmentation materials**. Frequency of implant loss was not different between simultaneous and staged approaches (7–8%).
Die durchschnittliche Einheilungszeit betrug bei einzeitigem Vorgehen 6 Monate (aK) bzw. 8 Monate (KEM), bei zweizeitigem Vorgehen nach 6-monatiger Integrationszeit des **Augmentats** 6–7 Monate (aK und KEM). Die Implantatverluste unterschieden sich in Bezug auf die einzeitige oder zweizeitige SBEA und Implantation nicht (7–8%). |
| Selected response from:
Fantutti
Canada
| Note from asker to answererNot the easiest of questions to grade. Both answers were plausible and contained useful references - so thank you for that. The peer grades didn't help much - one for each answer, with no additional comments. So in the end, it came down to personal preference, because there weren't really any other factors by which I could pick a "winner". And my personal preference here is for "augmentation materials". So that is what I'll use. Many thanks Fantutti, but thanks also and commiserations to Richard - appreciate your help.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer |
|
3 mins confidence:   peer agreement (net): +1 |
13 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +1 |
| augmentation materials
Explanation:
[PDF] Sinusbodenelevation und -augmentation
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
... einzeitige oder zweizeitige SBEA und Implantation nicht (7 ... studies,reviews), and
language (German or English). ... an vitalem Knochen im **Augmentat** zeitabhängig zu ...
www.springerlink.com/index/GMJ2F6RNGY98TPY7.pdf
The average duration of the healing period was 6 months (AB) and 8 months (BSM) with simultaneous SFEA and implantation and 6–7 months (AB and BSM) for the staged approach after an average healing period of 6 months for the **augmentation materials**. Frequency of implant loss was not different between simultaneous and staged approaches (7–8%).
Die durchschnittliche Einheilungszeit betrug bei einzeitigem Vorgehen 6 Monate (aK) bzw. 8 Monate (KEM), bei zweizeitigem Vorgehen nach 6-monatiger Integrationszeit des **Augmentats** 6–7 Monate (aK und KEM). Die Implantatverluste unterschieden sich in Bezug auf die einzeitige oder zweizeitige SBEA und Implantation nicht (7–8%).
| Fantutti
Canada
Works in field
PRO pts in category: 51
|
| Note from asker to answerer| Not the easiest of questions to grade. Both answers were plausible and contained useful references - so thank you for that. The peer grades didn't help much - one for each answer, with no additional comments. So in the end, it came down to personal preference, because there weren't really any other factors by which I could pick a "winner". And my personal preference here is for "augmentation materials". So that is what I'll use. Many thanks Fantutti, but thanks also and commiserations to Richard - appreciate your help. |
|
| | Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Return to KudoZ list
| |
The translation workplace 
