12:31 Sep 27, 2000 |
German to English translations [PRO] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Selected response from: Tim Drayton Cyprus Local time: 12:05 | ||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
na | lit. mountains of staff/employees |
| ||
na | peak personnel/staffing/manpower requirement |
| ||
na | staffing curve |
|
lit. mountains of staff/employees Explanation: but I think the way you describe it, a pyramid is meant, rather than a mountain (e.g. staffing pyramid). Muret-Sanders |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
peak personnel/staffing/manpower requirement Explanation: _manpower_ contains a gender bias that's generally tolerated because personpower just doesn't fly. The politically correct term In the US) -- human resources-- would require some provbably fairly awkward restructuring. Reference: http://www-projet.cst.cnes.fr/SpaceOps/Automation/6_15.html |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
staffing curve Explanation: I played around with some hunches on the search engines, and this one brought home the goodies. For example, at the URL quoted, in the section: Plan effectively with requirements based on estimates ... they generate an early picture of your schedule and staffing curve right at the beginning of the project life style Search engines come up with plenty more examples Reference: http://www.spc.ca/products/estimate/overview.htm |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.