01:06 Jun 30, 2003 |
German to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering / process automation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Klaus Herrmann Germany Local time: 19:14 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | steday state error |
| ||
3 | remanent control deviation |
|
remanent control deviation Explanation: kann ich aber nicht 100%ig verifizieren. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-06-30 02:09:28 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- \"im eingeschwungenen Zustand\" -- \"after stabilization\" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
steday state error Explanation: Also referred to as steady state offset. The "im eingeschwungenen Zustand" is redundant IMO because that's excatly what *bleibende* Abweichung means: once the process has stabilized, a deviation from the setpoint remains. CTM: Steady State Error - [ Diese Seite übersetzen ] Steady-State Error. ... as follows: Now, simply apply the equations we talked about above. System type and steady-state error. If you ... www.engin.umich.edu/group/ctm/extras/ess/ess.html And now they're happy: :-) CTM: Steady State Error - ... clnum,clden) Our **steady-state error is zero** Ramp Input. num = conv ... Output-yellow') Our steady-state error is zero. Parabolic Input. num = conv ... www.engin.umich.edu/group/ctm/extras/ess/ess3.htm Reference: http://www.engin.umich.edu/group/ctm/extras/ess/ess.html |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.