GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
03:08 May 18, 2001 |
German to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Florin Badea Romania Local time: 07:34 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
na | detection sensitivity |
| ||
na | verification sensitivity |
| ||
na | detection sensitivity |
| ||
na | detection sensitivity |
|
detection sensitivity Explanation: I think that's the right answer. Google search |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
verification sensitivity Explanation: i.e. the size at which an indication of a crack by magnetic means can be verified is 1mm and therefore is not permitted. Check this site for more: http://www.visiontechnologies.net/index.html?page=/crack.htm... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
detection sensitivity Explanation: second to ppcce's answer, which is definiitely correct in this context. Corenelsen's Tech WB Machinenbau, Anlagetechnik & Umwelttechnik Reference: http://www.home4u.de/niven/rn_dic.htm |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
detection sensitivity Explanation: OK, just so that you know that pppce and Ken Cox are right! Experience |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.