GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
21:40 Jun 30, 2004 |
Hungarian to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright / application procedure | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Csaba Ban Hungary Local time: 18:55 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | inventive step |
| ||
5 | did not an invent; there was no act of invention |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
feltalálói lépés inventive step Explanation: az előző válaszomban idézett törvény 1. szakaszában szerepel -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 19 mins (2004-06-30 21:59:48 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Érdekes módon a sokszor idézett www.tring.hu oldalon szereplő fordítás NEM azonos az általam talált oldalon lévő fordítással. Első ránézésre a tring-fordítás a gyengébb minőségű. (http://www.tring.hu/jogasz/angol/1991_38_tv.htm) |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
feltalálói lépés did not an invent; there was no act of invention Explanation: "35 USc 102g bars the issuance of a patent where the applicant did not invent..." |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.