16:30 May 17, 2003 |
Polish to English translations [Non-PRO] Bus/Financial | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: KORNELIA ZWIÓR-HOŁENKO Local time: 05:49 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +3 | rank / ranking system |
| ||
4 | employee's assignement |
| ||
4 | been before |
|
employee's assignement Explanation: Changing an Employee's Assignment Status. Distribution. HRMS Payroll Specialist. Related Procedures. None. Ownership. The Chief Human www.virginia.edu/integratedsystem/ howdoi/HTML/NAV7031P/MAINDOC.htm - 4k |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
rank / ranking system Explanation: 1. Eliminate the obviously subjective evaluation and ranking system, (uniform raise percentages are better than the current system of patronage and spoils be fair) 2. Eliminate the obviously unfair EBA practice, (spread shortfalls evenly as an overhead expense on all employees, rather than sacrificing selected individuals so as to advertise artificially low overhead rates be truthful) 3. Publish the statistics of minority (by group) and female percentage in job, rank group, salary level, raise percentage, and EBA group (by year), -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-05-17 16:55:30 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND EVALUATIONS It shall be required that every employee holding any job position that substantially deviates from the normally prescribed job duties of such employee\'s rank be required within ninety (90) days to submit a reallocation evaluation to the Personnel Office indicating any substantial additions or deletions to his/her job duties, including a recommendation that such job should or should not be reallocated to a higher job classification. www.michigan.gov/documents/ARTICLE_23_16974_7.pdf Reference: http://www.spse.org/Letters_to_Wu_Garcia.html |
| |