GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
14:30 Aug 25, 2002 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents / ICC | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Maria Luisa Duarte Spain Local time: 23:13 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 +4 | at first glance |
|
at first glance Explanation: eu utilizaria este termo! -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2002-08-25 14:48:05 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- \"Assuming for purposes of this discussion that the regulation meets the test of the Administrative Procedure Act and is otherwise not arbitrary and capricious, does it permit the states to enact legislation aimed at the same objective of organ allocation? «««At first glance»»», the OPTN regulation seems to make clear its intent to override any attempt by a state to legislate allocation. Section 121.12 of the regulation provides as follows:\" |
| |