17:56 Aug 7, 2006 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Linguistics / Verbs | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Muriel Vasconcellos United States Local time: 06:50 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | The fact that occurrence of the prefix "xxx-" is governed by |
| ||
3 | prefix occurrence condition |
|
prefix occurrence condition Explanation: - |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
The fact that occurrence of the prefix "xxx-" is governed by Explanation: I turned this around a bit to make it easier to understand. I don't believe I've done any violence to the author's intent. "The fact that occurrence of the prefix "xxx-" is governed by presence of the benefactive suffix "-xxx", and that both have the same form, suggests that the prefix and the suffix may actually be the same affix and perform the same function." Larry Hyman and Al Mtenje "Prosodic morphology and tone: the case of Chichewa": This is ... **is governed by the presence of a following (non-appearing) yer**. ... linguistlist.org/issues/10/10-1933.html ... where the suffix "realizes" a feature usually reserved for the prefix is to have contextual allomorphy for **the suffix governed by the presence of F**, ... listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0403b&L=dm-list&P=1857 specific affix is a prefix in a given environment, it is also a prefix in all other ... **arguments cannot be only governed by the presence of rich agreement**, ... www.gslt.hum.gu.se/~svet/links/c40filol.pdf |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.