GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
18:33 Oct 18, 2007 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: trans4u Local time: 02:05 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | multi-count indictment/charges/offense |
| ||
4 | (consisting of) concurrence of several criminal offenses |
| ||
3 | complex |
|
complex Explanation: http://www.monografias.com/trabajos12/tsinnom/tsinnom.shtml |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
multi-count indictment/charges/offense Explanation: TEXAS INTERNET BUREAU INVESTIGATION NETS MULTI-COUNT INDICTMENTS ON CHILD PORNOGRAPHY Two Navarro County Men Indicted for Sexual Abuse of Children AUSTIN - An investigation launched by the Attorney General's Texas Internet Bureau last year has resulted in the indictments today of two Navarro County men on 65 counts of sexual abuse, child sexual abuse and online child pornography charges - including aggravated sexual assault, indecency with a child, and promotion and possession of child pornography. http://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/newsarchive/2002/2002081... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(consisting of) concurrence of several criminal offenses Explanation: There`s no one-to-one equivalent in English. Unisubsistente (=single crime): consiting of only one criminal offense. This link provides explanation of the "Hierarchy rule": http://annualreport.ucpd.ucla.edu/2005/introduction/in_this_... The concurrence contends that the context of the text of ORS 163.095 suggests that the legislature did not intend to punish separately the various kinds of underlying acts that would support a conviction for aggravated murder. Rather, in the concurrence's view, the factors in ORS 163.095 are simply alternative theories to show that the offense of aggravated murder has been committed, and the legislature did not intend for those alternatives to be separately punished. http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A91378.htm 1. As a matter of statutory interpretation, §924(c)(1)(A) defines a single offense, in which brandishing and discharging are sentencing factors to be found by the judge, not offense elements to be found by the jury. Pp. 4—9. (...) The prohibition’s structure suggests that brandishing and discharging are sentencing factors. Federal laws usually list all offense elements in a single sentence and separate the sentencing factors into subsections. Castillo v. United States, 530 U.S. 120, 125. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/0-10666.ZS.html To address the issue of concurrence, that is whether two or more crimes charged in the Indictment could be considered the same offense, the Trial Chamber ... 69.94.11.53/ENGLISH/cases/KayRuz/judgement/7.htm - 41k - (3) If the deeds stipulated in paragraph (1) have been followed by a grave offense, the rules pertaining the concurrence of several offenses in one action ... www.legislationline.org/legislation.php?tid=180&lid=7392&le... - 15k - |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.