CAT tools comparison Thread poster: marine pavis
|
hello, I have to do a comparison work about Trados 6.5, SdLX and DejaVuX. Which one suits you best and why? What are the major advantages and disavantages of these CAT tools, according to you, and why? Thank you for your help! marine, student in Lille, France | | | Natalie Poland Local time: 23:19 Member (2002) English to Russian + ... Moderator of this forum SITE LOCALIZER
Have you tried to do a forum search? Similar questions has been asked already several times. Here is one of the recent threads: http://www.proz.com/topic/39044 and I am sure you'll find more Natalia | | | Gerard de Noord France Local time: 23:19 Member (2003) English to Dutch + ... Why has the "CAT Fight" been discontinued? | Nov 30, 2005 |
"The CAT center is undergoing an update." That's all I've seen for the last months. Wordfast 4 seems to be the only tool with ratings but I'm sure the large majority of Wordfast users has moved on to Wordfast 5. Upgrading was free. I really liked the former Cat Fight tool. It gave freelancers valuable information about the usefulness and the installed base of the many tools around. Kind regards, Gerard | | | Drew MacFadyen United States Local time: 18:19 Spanish to English + ... CAT Tool comparison (CAT Fight) resurrection | Dec 5, 2012 |
I am pleased to announce that ProZ.com has revived the "CAT Fight" product and is now called the "Software comparison tool" and can be found at http://www.proz.com/software-comparison-tool You can leave reviews, rate reviews and usability and more. Thanks Drew | |
|
|
Some people/companies feel no shame! | Dec 6, 2012 |
Drew MacFadyen wrote: I am pleased to announce that ProZ.com has revived the "CAT Fight" product and is now called the "Software comparison tool" and can be found at http://www.proz.com/software-comparison-tool You can leave reviews, rate reviews and usability and more. The tool that goes by the name of "GeoWorkZ - Translation Workspace" has one review and five stars (the maximum). It also has five stars for ease of learning. The review was written by Gisela Donnarumma, and guess what, she works for Geoworkz, a division of Lionbridge. I was under the impression the "Software comparison tool" was supposed to host reviews by translators, not shameless plugs by employees of the companies that make these tools. Was I mistaken? | | | Drew MacFadyen United States Local time: 18:19 Spanish to English + ... Review hidden | Dec 6, 2012 |
Domanique - you're right that the review is from an individual associated with the manufacturer or that tool. I have hidden the review. I am not sure precisely how we will proceed, but perhaps we could permit this type of review but then have it tagged "reviewer maybe affiliated with this tool" as the content/information may be of interest/value to some. Amazon and other review aggregators have permitted reviews of this sort, while highlighting the fact that they are affiliated wit... See more Domanique - you're right that the review is from an individual associated with the manufacturer or that tool. I have hidden the review. I am not sure precisely how we will proceed, but perhaps we could permit this type of review but then have it tagged "reviewer maybe affiliated with this tool" as the content/information may be of interest/value to some. Amazon and other review aggregators have permitted reviews of this sort, while highlighting the fact that they are affiliated with the product in some way. Thanks Drew ▲ Collapse | | | Shameless indeed | Dec 6, 2012 |
Dominique Pivard wrote: I was under the impression the "Software comparison tool" was supposed to host reviews by translators, not shameless plugs by employees of the companies that make these tools. Was I mistaken? You are not wrong and that's not the only case. Heartsome got 2 five star reviews from employees. Regards, Rodolfo | | | Samuel Murray Netherlands Local time: 23:19 Member (2006) English to Afrikaans + ... Shameless censorship | Dec 7, 2012 |
Drew MacFadyen wrote: Dominique - you're right that the review is from an individual associated with the manufacturer or that tool. I have hidden the review. In my opinion, such reviews should be allowed to remain, but there should be a field that shows whether the person is associated with the software or the company. Even previous associations should be mentioned (so that would have implications for Heartsome, won't it?). This will make it possible for people who are from tiny villages where you can't trust the opinion of someone who is involved in the development of something to read the reviews, without infringing on the pleasure of those of us who have no such superstitions. If you do that, you may have to make a special decision about associations for opensource projects or for projects that allow volunteer participation in the development of the software or its official documentation. | |
|
|
Samuel Murray Netherlands Local time: 23:19 Member (2006) English to Afrikaans + ... Portal meaning of "review" | Dec 7, 2012 |
Rodolfo Raya wrote: Heartsome got 2 five star reviews from employees. When I first heard about the reviews, I was expecting something with more body. These "reviews" used on the CAT tool comparator are often simply comments. You can't call that a review... oh, well, I suppose you can. Such comment-based "reviews" work great for portals where users made use of a product or service once or twice (e.g. accommodation or restaurants) but for the CAT fight such comments are not really useful if they replace real "reviews". I don't mind having them there, but they are "comments" or "first impressions", not "reviews". | | | Drew MacFadyen United States Local time: 18:19 Spanish to English + ... Reviews value, tagging employee | Dec 7, 2012 |
We will allow these type of reviews, but then identify or flag them as being from someone that is associated with that product, and we will be giving the community of users an option to "flag" a review as potentially from an employee of that tool manufacturer or in some way affiliated with the manufacturer. Sam - you're right the reviews so far include many that are more comments or commentary than full review. A full in depth review would be of greater benefit to the community a... See more We will allow these type of reviews, but then identify or flag them as being from someone that is associated with that product, and we will be giving the community of users an option to "flag" a review as potentially from an employee of that tool manufacturer or in some way affiliated with the manufacturer. Sam - you're right the reviews so far include many that are more comments or commentary than full review. A full in depth review would be of greater benefit to the community at large, but the comment and quick reviews are still valuable data points for translators to consider. It is hoped that more in-depth reviews will be created, and as they are more valuable to users, they will be "thumb'd up" indicating that, that review is more helpful, which will push that review towards the top of the reviews for that tool. Thanks for all the feedback and continued interest in the software comparison tool. Drew ▲ Collapse | | | TransAdvisor | Dec 12, 2012 |
LOL. If you use TripAdvisor and look at a review in the early stage, there are usually two reviews, 5 and 0 star. One is written by the hotel manager's sister-in-law, goes like "Delightful stay. Charming staff. Fantastic food...". Then a second one like "Horrific place. Roaches in the salad. Bugs in the bed. Avoid at any cost"... written by the hotel-across-the-road's brother-in-law - yves heck, where's my half-brother's telephone number now? Drew MacFadyen wrote: Domanique - you're right that the review is from an individual associated with the manufacturer or that tool. I have hidden the review. I am not sure precisely how we will proceed, but perhaps we could permit this type of review but then have it tagged "reviewer maybe affiliated with this tool" as the content/information may be of interest/value to some. Amazon and other review aggregators have permitted reviews of this sort, while highlighting the fact that they are affiliated with the product in some way. Thanks Drew | | | Drew MacFadyen United States Local time: 18:19 Spanish to English + ... Flagging enabled, more reviews needed | Dec 24, 2012 |
Hi Yves - hope you're doing well. You're right that in the early stages aggregate reviews can be easily skewed by those with a vested interest in that tools success, or failure. We have added the functionality to "flag" reviews as inappropriate, violating site rules, or being from someone that may be associated with that tool (or a competitor with an ax to grind). These reviews for now are being hidden, but will ultimately be highlighted or tagged as being from a person possibly a... See more Hi Yves - hope you're doing well. You're right that in the early stages aggregate reviews can be easily skewed by those with a vested interest in that tools success, or failure. We have added the functionality to "flag" reviews as inappropriate, violating site rules, or being from someone that may be associated with that tool (or a competitor with an ax to grind). These reviews for now are being hidden, but will ultimately be highlighted or tagged as being from a person possibly associated with that tool. We're still making improvements to the system but still need more data entry and more reviews, including more qualitative, substantive reviews. I will seek to remedy that moving in to 2013. Thanks Drew ▲ Collapse | |
|
|
| esperantisto Local time: 01:19 Member (2006) English to Russian + ... SITE LOCALIZER
Dominique Pivard wrote: What are the criteria used to separate "top" tools from others? In terms of user base, OmegaT and Across (non-top) are definitely bigger than Heartsome and MemSource (top). Particularly given the fact that OmegaT and especially Across have more user reviews. And not to mention Google Translate. As a Proz heading says: More than 200 million global users click onto Google Translate alone every month.
[Edited at 2012-12-26 11:44 GMT] | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » CAT tools comparison Trados Studio 2022 Freelance | The leading translation software used by over 270,000 translators.
Designed with your feedback in mind, Trados Studio 2022 delivers an unrivalled, powerful desktop
and cloud solution, empowering you to work in the most efficient and cost-effective way.
More info » |
| CafeTran Espresso | You've never met a CAT tool this clever!
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |