  The translation workplace | |||
| |||
| |||||||||
| Mar 1 Language’s evolution does not change communicationSource: The Paw Print Story flagged by  Lea Lozancic
See: The Paw Print
Subscribe to the translation news daily digest here.
See more translation news.
 Follow ProZ.com on Twitter Share | Translation news |
Software comparison tool
Share an article »
Spain
Local time: 04:31
English to Spanish
+ ...
The Germanic tribes did not migrate to Britain in 1066. By 1066 the Anglo-Saxons had been in Britain for some 500 years already.
United Kingdom
Local time: 03:31
Hebrew to English
It's linguistic (and historical) nonsense.
The English Language ORIGINATED in 1066?
Anglo-Norman French? Vikings? Foreigners? "exposed THE LANGUAGE" what language? What???
I can say this with confidence: Evan Munch should NOT be teaching English. Not if this statement reflects his repertoire of linguistic "knowledge".
Side note: the Normans (who invaded in 1066) could theoretically be considered "Germanic" since they were themselves the descendants of "Norsemen" or "Vikings".
[Edited at 2013-03-02 11:26 GMT]
United Kingdom
Local time: 03:31
Hebrew to English
"The Paw Print" : the voice of Plainfield South High School.
...it's starting to make sense (and definitely shouldn't have been posted, not on this site anyhow).
[Edited at 2013-03-02 11:43 GMT]
The beauty of learning various languages is to improve communication. Evolution is a continuous process.
United Kingdom
Local time: 03:31
Portuguese to English
+ ...
http://www.merriam-webster.com/help/faq/history.htm
To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:
You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »
This discussion can also be accessed via the ProZ.com forum pages.