GT4T and Across
Thread poster: CafeTran Training
CafeTran Training
Netherlands
Local time: 03:35
Oct 21

Across is a rather closed ecosystem. It comes in two flavours: in a web browser and as a desktop app. Both have the table presentation in common: source at the left, target at the right. You can download a free version of the desktop app. To test the browser version, you’ll need someone to set up a project for you.

It seems to me that GT4T could supply the long awaited solution to free Across from its self chosen cage. Dallas could you please have a look at this?

Download: http://www.my-across.net/en/download/

On second thought: I'm getting doubts about what the UI of crossWeb looks like. It's been some months ago that I was invited to use it. Perhaps one of the regular users can post a screenshot?

This is what I found:

acrossHaupt_image1507

I'm afraid that this is a rather old image.

One of the biggest objections that many translators have against Across is the fact that we don't have full control over what we've produced. Dallas, does GT4T offer a kind of 'logging feature' that will allow creating a TMX file containing the bare text of all source and target segments translated via GT4T? (I think that RTF formatting is less relevant here.)

Can Across be configured to populate empty segments with the source language first? GT4T could pick this up. But how to handle segments where a fuzzy match is inserted? How can GT4T get the source text then? (Store FM, copy S > T, get S, restore FM?)


[Edited at 2017-10-21 09:27 GMT]


Direct link Reply with quote
 

Gerald von Stein-Salisbury
Local time: 03:35
English to German
Across, CrossWeb, Google Translate, Dallas Oct 21

Hello,
this is an interesting post, and with respect to where it comes from I can understand.
If your process owner (=customer) wants to have Google machine translated used for his project he can automatically populate the target translations with 100% TM entries and fill in the rest with MT from numerous MT machines. It is a standard feature of Across. If he does not want this to happen it will not be done and it will not be possible to automatically fill in MT segments as a translator. And yes, one can export TMX (but why?). And yes, Across can fill in single or all source segments into the target (but why?), and even the translator can do this whenever he wants (and who is Dallas?).
And you have as much control over the product as your process owner (=customer) gives you, so it is generally possible to see what you produced by having a look at the target preview whenever you want. BUT, no matter what you are up to: One definitely needs more insight in the product before fantasizing cool ideas about things "could work" and please: Geniet van de liberale stofcontrole in nederland! Please feel free to contact me anytime in case you have any questions.

Best regards
GAvSS


Direct link Reply with quote
 

Andrzej Lejman  Identity Verified
Local time: 03:35
German to Polish
+ ...
You are right Oct 21

Abandon Across.

Direct link Reply with quote
 

Gerald von Stein-Salisbury
Local time: 03:35
English to German
abandon across Oct 21

What does "Abandon Across" have to do with the non-existent question?

Direct link Reply with quote
 
CafeTran Training
Netherlands
Local time: 03:35
TOPIC STARTER
To own or not to own Oct 22

“And you have as much control over the product as your process owner (=customer) gives you”

Sometimes the translator needs to have more control, then GT4T can come in handy. BTW: Dallas is the developer of this nice tool.


Direct link Reply with quote
 

Gerald von Stein-Salisbury
Local time: 03:35
English to German
Very interesting Oct 22

Delivering a MT instead of a human translation ... one can call that necessary. Or one can call it fraud. It might even be a reason why a wide range of translation purchasers like across. And maybe that's why some translators dont. Ill be happy to help with any technical issues related to translation.

Direct link Reply with quote
 
CafeTran Training
Netherlands
Local time: 03:35
TOPIC STARTER
Sorry, but you got it wrong ... Oct 22

Gerald von Stein-Salisbury wrote:

Delivering a MT instead of a human translation ... one can call that necessary. Or one can call it fraud. It might even be a reason why a wide range of translation purchasers like across. And maybe that's why some translators dont. Ill be happy to help with any technical issues related to translation.


I'm afraid that you are jumping to conclusions here. Is it because of blind fear of how MT systems can surely be helpful and improve the quality of your work? I never suggested to blindly accept the results of any MT system.

BTW: Across is in my opinion exactly the system that takes your control away and urges you to use less resources to improve the quality of your work as a translator.


Direct link Reply with quote
 

Shouguang Cao
China
Local time: 10:35
Member (2007)
English to Chinese
+ ...
No logging Oct 23

Hi CafeTran,

GT4T doesn't offer such a logging feature and I don't have experience with Across yet. Maybe someday I will download and try it.

Dallas

CafeTran Training wrote:

Across is a rather closed ecosystem. It comes in two flavours: in a web browser and as a desktop app. Both have the table presentation in common: source at the left, target at the right. You can download a free version of the desktop app. To test the browser version, you’ll need someone to set up a project for you.

It seems to me that GT4T could supply the long awaited solution to free Across from its self chosen cage. Dallas could you please have a look at this?

Download: http://www.my-across.net/en/download/

On second thought: I'm getting doubts about what the UI of crossWeb looks like. It's been some months ago that I was invited to use it. Perhaps one of the regular users can post a screenshot?

This is what I found:

acrossHaupt_image1507

I'm afraid that this is a rather old image.

One of the biggest objections that many translators have against Across is the fact that we don't have full control over what we've produced. Dallas, does GT4T offer a kind of 'logging feature' that will allow creating a TMX file containing the bare text of all source and target segments translated via GT4T? (I think that RTF formatting is less relevant here.)

Can Across be configured to populate empty segments with the source language first? GT4T could pick this up. But how to handle segments where a fuzzy match is inserted? How can GT4T get the source text then? (Store FM, copy S > T, get S, restore FM?)


[Edited at 2017-10-21 09:27 GMT]


Direct link Reply with quote
 


To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:


You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »

GT4T and Across

Advanced search






Déjà Vu X3
Try it, Love it

Find out why Déjà Vu is today the most flexible, customizable and user-friendly tool on the market. See the brand new features in action: *Completely redesigned user interface *Live Preview *Inline spell checking *Inline

More info »
PerfectIt consistency checker
Faster Checking, Greater Accuracy

PerfectIt helps deliver error-free documents. It improves consistency, ensures quality and helps to enforce style guides. It’s a powerful tool for pro users, and comes with the assurance of a 30-day money back guarantee.

More info »



Forums
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search