Yet another "recovery" hoax?
Thread poster: Dipl.-Kfm. Bernhard Aicher MBA
I thought the following article from the EIR Strategic Alert newsletter is also in the interest of translators and that one should not believe everything in the business pages of even renowned newspapers:
Yet Another “Recovery” Hoax
On Nov. 5, US Treasury Secretary John SNOW gave an enthusiastic address to the “Economic Club” in Washington.
“We’ve seen a real turnaround this year, and the recovery is clearly solidifying,” he said. Snow pointed to the spectacular 7.2% “growth” figure for US gross domestic product (GDP) during the 3rd Quarter, which had been released by the Commerce Department on Oct. 30. He said, “it seems clear that we have entered a new phase of economic expansion. This is not a fleeting glimmer, there is real muscle behind the growth trend.”
Reality however is quite different. Like the “new economy” bubble of the late 1990s, the new hype about the US economic miracle is again based on two pillars: fraud and debt. According to the Commerce Department, GDP rose from $9,629 billion in the 2nd Quarter to $9,797 billion in the 3rd Quarter, an increase of $168 billion or 1.7%. The 7.2% “growth” rate was fabricated by annualizing, that is by quadrupling, the quarterly growth rate.
However, even the $168 billion figure has been massaged by creative accounting. The factor which officially
contributed the most to the GDP growth during the 3rd Quarter was investments in computers, rising from $354.9 billion to $390.3 billion, if measured in “1996 dollars.” But the Commerce Department admits in the same
report that actual computer sales increased only from $82.4 billion to $88.3 billion. How is this possible? The reason
is the special method of manipulating the original sales data in order to account for changes in the quality of the products, called “hedonic” pricing. To put it simply: The Commerce Department claims that a present computer
with a market price of $1000 in 2003 would have cost $4420 in 1996. Therefore, if any company buys a computer
for $1000, the GDP as calculated by the Commerce Department immediately rises by $4420. Thereby, an increase
in computer sales of $5.9 billion has been turned in to a $35.4 billion rise in the 3rd Quarter, a sixfold increase.
There are other categories besides computer investment where similar methods are being used. The remaining part
of increased GDP was accomplished by the generation of a much larger amount of new debt. In every one of recent
years, US private households, corporations and the governmen thave produced a combined $2 trillion of additional
debt. During the 2nd Quarter 2003, the last figure available, US indebtedness even increased by an annualized
$3,396 billion, an all-time record. Compared to this, the annualized $168 billion increase of GDP in the 3rd Quarter
is a rather small figure.
Meanwhile, the job disaster continues. On Nov. 4, the job agency Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that large
US Corporations had announced 172,000 job cuts in October, more than twice as many as during September. Of the
human resources executives polled by the job agency, 78% did not see any significant upturn in hiring within the next
| Watch the source || Nov 13, 2003 |
This publication seems to come from Lyndon LaRouche, who is widely regarded in the US as a crackpot conspiracy theorist. Or do I have the wrong publication? Has this been verified by other sources?
Daina Jauntirans wrote:
This publication seems to come from Lyndon LaRouche, who is widely regarded in the US as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
I don't consider Lyndon LaRouche as a crackpot. I have read his newsletters for years and I confirm that his economic analysis and forecasts prove to be true in almost every case, even if he sometimes is years ahead of his time. I agree however that his political position is controversial.
If he is widely regarded as a crackpot that does not necessarily mean that the majority is right.
Has this been verified by other sources?
How could I verify? Also, the Jessica Lynch story was widely regarded to be true. Even if it would have been verified by other sources it remains untrue.
[Edited at 2003-11-13 22:27]
| This reminds me of "Yes Prime Minister" || Nov 14, 2003 |
Hacker is instructed by Henry in the art of doctoring of reports. There is a lot of changing the bases of comparison to put oneself in a good light. Same thing with the opinion polls. By asking 2 sets of different questions, it is possible to get at diametrally opposing results.
| You're entitled to your opinion || Nov 14, 2003 |
about LaRouche. I actually have no problem believing that the numbers were "frisiert", I just do not believe a lot that comes from the LaRouche camp. If any "mainstream" economists came up with the same, then I would look at the issue more closely.
Incidentally, Jessica Lynch herself doesn't like how the story was played up by the military and has gone on US TV saying so this week. A large part of the problem ascertaining the truth of such stories comes from the fact that the media rushes to get the story out without checking all of the facts.
To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:
You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »
Yet another "recovery" hoax?
|For clarity and excellence|
WordFinder is the leading dictionary service that gives you the words you want anywhere, anytime.
Access 260+ dictionaries from the world's leading dictionary publishers in virtually any device.
Find the right word anywhere, anytime - online or offline.
More info »
|Manage your TMs and Terms ... and boost your translation business|
Are you ready for something fresh in the industry? TM-Town is a unique new site for you -- the freelance translator -- to store, manage and share translation memories (TMs) and glossaries...and potentially meet new clients on the basis of your prior work.
More info »