IS \"MY GERIATRIC BRAIN\" BETTER THAN A GOOGLE SUBSTANTIATION?
Thread poster: DR. RICHARD BAVRY (X)

DR. RICHARD BAVRY (X)
Spanish to English
+ ...
Nov 9, 2001

Or should that be chalked up as a \"Sven\"gali-esque approach?





 

Mats Wiman  Identity Verified
Sweden
Local time: 00:31
Member (2000)
German to Swedish
+ ...

MODERATOR
The right of being "gali-esque" Nov 9, 2001

The question of whether \"my geriatric brain\" is a proof of the absolute truth has to be judged by the asker/reader - like with all references.

I sometimes offer \"13 years in Germany\" as my reference. This might not convince some (\"13 years in Germany do not make you an

expert\") but in some cases it\'s the source of my knowledge and what I can say without starting a time consuming research.

As with any reference, the asker is the judge and s/he has to evaluate the answer according to the function


PA = QE * CR * AR * NA


PA = Probability of accepting an answer

QE = Quality of Explanation

CR = Credibility of Reference

AR = Answerer\'s Record

NA = Number of \'Agree\'s


In the Swedish community, IF the asker knows me and the answer is simple and IF I believe the asker can judge the answer solely on its own merits, I sometimes use \"YKW\" (You Know Who) as reference


One answerer constantly uses his own URL as a reference, which I find a bit cheeky


BUT:


Every reference is permissible - for what it\'s worth


Mats



 

DR. RICHARD BAVRY (X)
Spanish to English
+ ...
TOPIC STARTER
Nov 9, 2001

Quote:


On 2001-11-09 19:30, MatsWiman wrote:

The question of whether \"my geriatric brain\" is a proof of the absolute truth has to be judged by the asker/reader - like with all references.

I sometimes offer \"13 years in Germany\" as my reference. This might not convince some (\"13 years in Germany do not make you an

expert\") but in some cases it\'s the source of my knowledge and what I can say without starting a time consuming research.

As with any reference, the asker is the judge and s/he has to evaluate the answer according to the function


PA = QE * CR * AR * NA


PA = Probability of accepting an answer

QE = Quality of Explanation

CR = Credibility of Reference

AR = Answerer\'s Record

NA = Number of \'Agree\'s


In the Swedish community, IF the asker knows me and the answer is simple and IF I believe the asker can judge the answer solely on its own merits, I sometimes use \"YKW\" (You Know Who) as reference


One answerer constantly uses his own URL as a reference, which I find a bit cheeky


BUT:


Every reference is permissible - for what it\'s worth


Mats





Oh Mats, didn\'t you realize I was just poking fun at good old Sven and his lovable tagline reference!


 

Mats Wiman  Identity Verified
Sweden
Local time: 00:31
Member (2000)
German to Swedish
+ ...

MODERATOR
Fun-poking Nov 10, 2001

Dear Richard,


No I did not.


The question has been put by others: \"Why does he consistently refer to MGB?\"


My answer really meant to counter all objections to various references.


Mats


 


To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:


You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »

IS \"MY GERIATRIC BRAIN\" BETTER THAN A GOOGLE SUBSTANTIATION?

Advanced search






BaccS – Business Accounting Software
Modern desktop project management for freelance translators

BaccS makes it easy for translators to manage their projects, schedule tasks, create invoices, and view highly customizable reports. User-friendly, ProZ.com integration, community-driven development – a few reasons BaccS is trusted by translators!

More info »
Déjà Vu X3
Try it, Love it

Find out why Déjà Vu is today the most flexible, customizable and user-friendly tool on the market. See the brand new features in action: *Completely redesigned user interface *Live Preview *Inline spell checking *Inline

More info »



Forums
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search