Article: Machine translation (MT), and the future of the translation industry
Thread poster: Staff Staff
Local time: 06:56
Jun 26, 2005

This topic is for discussion of the translation article " Machine translation (MT), and the future of the translation industry".

Direct link Reply with quote

Romuald Pawlikowski  Identity Verified
Local time: 15:56
Member (2004)
English to Polish
+ ...
MT will "happen", but the timeline is shifting Mar 2, 2006

I basically agree with Yves, but I am sure that the advance of MT is not happening so fast to provide really acceptable translations in the suggested time (3-5 years).

The article is dated 2001 and MT still has a long way to go...

Direct link Reply with quote

Fabio Descalzi  Identity Verified
Local time: 11:56
Member (2004)
German to Spanish
+ ...
Technical progress vs. human sensibility Jan 5, 2008

I have just read Yves Champollion's article. Very interesting, and a yellow light in front of us, freelancers.

I just want to comment the last paragraph of the article:
... if we stop dreaming of man re-creating man through science, and take our expectations to a reasonable level—can a machine actually perform some human tasks with reasonable accuracy, the answer is an obvious yes, and the time it will happen is soon. A decent MT machine is just around the corner. The computer computes chess, while Kasparov plays chess. A computer will never understand, but it can translate, at least to some extent. And, since translation without understanding is meaningless, the future of the human translator is proof-sensing what a machine has pre-translated.

If history proves Champollion to be right, then "proof-sensing" will be a new activity. Necessarily different from translation and proofreading. Because the usual way "one person translates, another person proofreads" would be substituted by a new scheme "a machine translates, then a person proofsenses".

The "proofsenser" will be:
1) an expert in machine translation: know in detail what the machine can translate and what it cannot,
2) an experienced translator AND proofreader.

Point 1 will be feasible, just like today we learn to use a CAT tool.
But point 2... will require translators with ACTUAL experience as such, and proofreaders with ACTUAL experience as such, in order to achieve valuable "proofsensers". Skills cost resources and money. In short: human sensibility will have a high market price. Ugly as it may sound, so will it be in such a scenario.

If conventional translators/proofreaders start to be scarce, then their rates will get higher - and the scheme "machine translation + proofsensing" will not be that convenient from the economical point of view. Which in turn, will challenge that eventual new scheme "a machine translates, a person proofsenses".

[Edited at 2008-01-05 11:38]

Direct link Reply with quote

To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:

Moderator(s) of this forum
Lucia Leszinsky[Call to this topic]

You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »

Article: Machine translation (MT), and the future of the translation industry

Advanced search

PerfectIt consistency checker
Faster Checking, Greater Accuracy

PerfectIt helps deliver error-free documents. It improves consistency, ensures quality and helps to enforce style guides. It’s a powerful tool for pro users, and comes with the assurance of a 30-day money back guarantee.

More info »
Protemos translation business management system
Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!

The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.

More info »

  • All of
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search