GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11:19 Feb 3, 2009 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Government / Politics / Aliens Act | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Rebecca Jowers Spain Local time: 15:17 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | et seq. |
| ||
5 +1 | ff. |
| ||
4 +1 | and those following |
| ||
4 | from Art. 4 onwards |
| ||
4 | and following |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
and those following Explanation: I think you hit the nail on the head... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
from Art. 4 onwards Explanation: The original does not specify whether it refers to all the articles after No. 4, just "art. 4 and those following" as a literal translation |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
and following Explanation: it means article 4 and following up until the next article of the same code is quoted. this could be article 4a, 4b,... etc and 5, etc or simply the entirety of article 4 of a set code Example sentence(s):
|
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
et seq. Explanation: yes that's right but it is generally translated using the latin "et seq." -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 21 mins (2009-02-03 11:41:36 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- An abbreviation for the Latin et sequentes or et sequentia, meaning "and the following." The phrase et seq. is used in references made to particular pages or sections of cases, articles, regulations, or statutes to indicate that the desired information is continued on the pages or in the sections following a designated page or section, as "p. 238 et seq." or "section 43 et seq." The abbreviation et seq. is sometimes used to denote a reference to more than one following page or section. Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb2... Reference: http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2007CSIH53.html |
| |