codice programmabile

07:00 Jun 29, 2010 

I was joking. As in, "I DIDN'T know that." My original suggestion suggested 64 transmitters.

06:58 Jun 29, 2010 

My post was just for any less tech savvy folks. ;)

06:56 Jun 29, 2010 

I knew that. (cough, cough)

06:55 Jun 29, 2010 

A rolling-code is a 'password' that changes systemmatically. I doubt they want 64 individual transmitting devices! Instead, they probably want one transmitter (i.e. no s plural on 'transmitter') - capable of scrolling through 64 codes.

"A rolling code (or sometimes called a hopping code) is used in keyless entry systems to prevent replay attacks, where an eavesdropper records the transmission and replays it at a later time to cause the receiver to 'unlock'." [Wikipedia]

11:54 Jun 28, 2010 

"...able to store up to 64 rolling-code transmitters or 1 programmable-code transmitter."

23:31 Jun 24, 2010 

I think the adjective order generally should be 'transmitter rolling-codes or (transmitter) programmable code.'
<br>[I prefer to write out most numbers between zero to nine in words - depending.]
<br>But in this case, I'd write (hyphens important):
<br>"able to store up to 64 transmitter-rolling-codes or one transmitter-programmable-code"
<br>The second 'transmitter' is optional, but it helps eliminate ambiguity.
<br>Without the hyphens, it could be confused as '64 transmitters' - or '64 programmable transmitters', etc.

11:23 Jun 24, 2010 

So the translation should be - "able to store up to 64 rolling code transmitters or 1 programmable code" or "able to store up to 64 rolling-code or 1 programmable code transmitters"?